TREES-LOUNGE MAILING LIST ARCHIVES
September 1997
Subject: Smooching Steve
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 16:23:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Rebecca L. Webb"

Yee haw, a mailing list! What have I missed?

Just in case I'm first, here's a topic to get things going. I've discussed this privately before but didn't really figure it out.

How come Steve says (he told Tom DiCillo) his kissing of Catherine Keener (in LIVING IN OBLIVION) is the first time he ever got to kiss the girl? Didn't ED AND HIS DEAD MOTHER come before LIVING IN OBLIVION? Why doesn't ED count?

Rebecca

{Moderator's note: This is the first message of the mailing list ever.}



Subject: LIO photo/song
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 16:27:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Rebecca L. Webb"

For anyone who missed the Vanity Fair article on the LIO Trio (Steve, Dermot, and James, the stars of LIVING IN OBLIVION), the photo from it is on my Mulroney Tidbits web page along with the words to the LIO Trio Lament.

http://cda.mrs.umn.edu/~webbrl/mulroney.html

Rebecca



Subject: Re: Smooching Steve
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 01:53:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kym Banoczi

Rebecca L. Webb wrote:
> Yee haw, a mailing list! What have I missed?

Hey Rebecca! I'm not sure you missed much, since I think Marni just started the list a week or so ago.

> Just in case I'm first, here's a topic to get things going. I've discussed this privately before but didn't really figure it out.

> How come Steve says (he told Tom DiCillo) his kissing of Catherine Keener (in LIVING IN OBLIVION) is the first time he ever got to kiss the girl? Didn't ED AND HIS DEAD MOTHER come before LIVING IN OBLIVION? Why doesn't ED count?

Yes, Ed and His Dead Mother predates LIO (by 2 or 3 years, I think). I have yet to see all of Ed and His Dead Mother, so I can't comment on the kissing scene, but maybe he was referring to kissing the lead gal? Dunno. By the way, if anyone has Ed and His Dead Mother on tape, I'd love to see it...:)

So, does anyone know when The Big Lebowski is due to come out? I keep hearing different dates...

Kym



Subject: Re: Smooching Steve
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 15:11:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marni Hager

On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Kym Banoczi wrote:
> Rebecca L. Webb wrote:
>> How come Steve says (he told Tom DiCillo) his kissing of Catherine Keener (in LIVING IN OBLIVION) is the first time he ever got to kiss the girl? Didn't ED AND HIS DEAD MOTHER come before LIVING IN OBLIVION? Why doesn't ED count?

> Yes, Ed and His Dead Mother predates LIO (by 2 or 3 years, I think). I have yet to see all of Ed and His Dead Mother, so I can't comment on the kissing scene, but maybe he was referring to kissing the lead gal?

I'm going to leave this one alone until after she's seen it. I wouldn't want to spoil it. ;-)

> Dunno. By the way, if anyone has Ed and His Dead Mother on tape, I'd love to see it...:)

I just searched my tapes, and found that this is one that I don't have yet. :-( To make matters worse, the best video store in all of the Riverside-Moreno Valley area went out of business last year because they failed to pay the rent. They were so cool because they had so much of Steve's stuff, including _Ed and His Dead Mother_ and _Kiss Daddy Goodnight_. I suppose all good things must come to an end. *sigh*

> So, does anyone know when The Big Lebowski is due to come out? I keep hearing different dates...

The last date that I saw was in US or Entertainment Weekly saying that it would be December or January. Premiere has it listed as a fall release. I personally don't think that anyone is going to have a clue when this movie will come out until it actually does. That seems to be the general trend in Hollywood these days.

Getting back on topic: What did everyone think of the picture of Steve from _The Big Lebowski_ that showed up in one of the magazines? I personally thought that he looked horrible. The hair was awful (and that's bad since it was short) and the clothes definitely have to go.

You think that he hates bowling, as much as he does golfing?

Marni



Subject: Nick and Nicole
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 23:36:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Rebecca L. Webb"

In message Kym Banoczi writes: (about Steve kissing Catherine in LIO)
> maybe he was referring to kissing the lead gal?

You know, this reminds me of a topic I've wondered about for a while. Heads up, Marni, this is WAY controversial.

I've asserted more than once that I think Tom DiCillo has an excessive (i.e. possibly inappropriate) crush on Catherine Keener...another man's wife. Check out the weirdness in the published screenplay for LIO...Tom talks about Catherine spending a lot of time visiting him, sans Dermot (I suppose Tom's wife might have been around). He also talks about making two separate calls to tell Catherine and Dermot about how LIO was doing at Sundance (what, spouses don't communicate anymore, even if they're in separate places?).

And then there's the obvious implied link in naming the characters Nick and Nicole and giving Steve a speech about the director writing the script because he's in love with the leading actress (DiCillo has admitted he wrote LIO for Catherine).

Has Steve ever discussed this? I've seen him discuss Nick the director, but what about Nick the leading man, Nick the love interest to Nicole?

Rebecca

P.S. - yes, there's Steve content in the LIO screenplay publication. He flew in and out of Sundance at mach speed accompanied by a publicist schlepping him around at a frantic pace. I don't think he was able to have as much fun as the other LIOites.



Subject: Re: Nick and Nicole
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 02:10:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marni Hager

On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Rebecca L. Webb wrote:
> You know, this reminds me of a topic I've wondered about for a while. Heads up, Marni, this is WAY controversial.

And, if this list were more active, I would have thrown most of it out. However because this list is rather quiet at the moment, I will allow posts that are related to the movies Steve's been in, even if the content is about co-stars. (If you disagree with this policy, let's deal with it now since we are a small group and have the time.)

> I've asserted more than once that I think Tom DiCillo has an excessive (i.e. possibly inappropriate) crush on Catherine Keener...another man's wife. Check out the weirdness in the published screenplay for LIO...Tom talks about Catherine spending a lot of time visiting him, sans Dermot (I suppose Tom's wife might have been around). He also talks about making two separate calls to tell Catherine and Dermot about how LIO was doing at Sundance (what, spouses don't communicate anymore, even if they're in separate places?).

Even if DiCillo has an excessive crush on Keener, what's the real problem if he's not acting it out? I have a "crush" on Steve (although, it's probably in a much different way than any of you), and have even written parts of scripts for him. It doesn't mean that I'm going to act on my wishes. And it must be considered that DiCillo is a good friend to both Keener and Mulroney. There is an element to marriage called trust. Don't forget that Mulroney has been working a tremendous amount these past few years. Wouldn't you want to go hang out with some friends if your spouse weren't around? As for the separate calls, I don't see anything wrong with that either. DiCillo was the director and was actually there when they weren't. Why get the information second hand, when you can get it from the source?

> And then there's the obvious implied link in naming the characters Nick and Nicole and giving Steve a speech about the director writing the script because he's in love with the leading actress (DiCillo has admitted he wrote LIO for Catherine).

You've lost me on the naming of the characters bit. As for writing the script for Keener, he referred to wanting to write something for her because Johnny Suede did not receive the attention he thought it should. (I'll double check this tomorrow.) Also, LiO began as a short and was expanded *only after* it received wonderful comments.

> Has Steve ever discussed this? I've seen him discuss Nick the director, but what about Nick the leading man, Nick the love interest to Nicole?

I don't recall Steve ever having commented about this. In fact, I don't recall seeing him even discuss Nick as a director. What interview am I forgetting about?

> P.S. - yes, there's Steve content in the LIO screenplay publication. He flew in and out of Sundance at mach speed accompanied by a publicist schlepping him around at a frantic pace. I don't think he was able to have as much fun as the other LIOites.

I doubt he was able to have as much fun as the other LiOites, but I have been curious if anyone else thought that he was among those drinking from the bottle that DiCillo refers to in the screenplay book. However I think that it was cool that he was able to make it to Sundance at all considering that it took place while he was busy filming his 5th(?) Coen Bros. film, _Fargo_.

My favorite part of the screenplay book is when DiCillo goes into describing the scene where Nick goes on a tirade. It just shows how incredible Steve is as an actor.

Marni



Subject: Steve directed commercials
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 12:59:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marni Hager

I was just looking at all of the information that can be found on the IMDB, and noticed that Steve is listed as having directed two commercials. One was for Nike, the other was for the WNBA. I was wondering if anyone has seen either of these, can tell me what the content of them are, and if they have gotten either of these on tape. Also, if you have seen them, what's your opinion of the work?

Speaking of the IMDB, is it me, or was _Even Cowgirls Get the Blues_ listed on his filmography at some point in time? Also, how did the _Immortals_ (with Dermot Mulroney's brother) end up on there at some point?

Finally, if you don't bother to read alt.fan.tarantino (you're better off for it ;-) I found a post that was real long about Pulp Fiction. The final statement in the post was to the effect that 'The guy who plays the Buddy Holly waiter played Mr Blonde in Reservoir Dogs.' I immediately posted correcting the person. Some people will never learn about who Steve is.

Marni



Subject: Dead Man
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 12:56:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marni Hager

I finally watched _Dead Man_ the other day. It's been reported that Steve plays the bartender. I was wondering if there's been any confirmation of this fact. One reason that I'm unclear is that he had no spoken lines, and we all know that his voice is very distinctive (even in _Lonesome Dove_ and _The Last Outlaw_). The other reason is that the facial hair was *definitely* not his own. It was much too bushy for Steve. I will say that the arms and hands did look like those of the former firefighter, but that's not enough for me to go on. Any information on this would be appreciated.

Btw, the bartender is only onscreen for a total of 30-60 seconds. That's correct, a total onscreen time of up to a *1 minute*.

Marni



Subject: Re: Steve directed commercials
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 02:26:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Rebecca L. Webb"

In message marni lynne hager writes:
> how did the _Immortals_ (with Dermot Mulroney's brother) end up on there at some point?

I've seen IMMORTALS. My best guess is that someone was confusing it at some point with KING OF NEW YORK. IMMORTALS features Eric Roberts as a crime kingpin who gathers a bunch of "losers" to pull off a big score. KONY features Christopher Walken as a crime kingpin who gathers a bunch of "losers" to pull off (and so on and so on and so on). The films really aren't that similar, though.

Rebecca



Subject: Re: Nick and Nicole
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 02:16:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kym Banoczi

> And, if this list were more active, I would have thrown most of it out. However because this list is rather quiet at the moment, I will allow posts that are related to the movies Steve's been in, even if the content is about co-stars. (If you disagree with this policy, let's deal with it now since we are a small group and have the time.)

I agree that we should allow these posts for the time, but also feel that once the list gets active (and I'm sure it will) we should keep the posts on the topic of Steve only.

Kym



Subject: Re: Steve directed commercials
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 02:21:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kym Banoczi

> Speaking of the IMDB, is it me, or was _Even Cowgirls Get the Blues_ listed on his filmography at some point in time? Also, how did the _Immortals_ (with Dermot Mulroney's brother) end up on there at some point?

I have both of those movies on my filmography, as well (and both were verified by other sources). I haven't seen The Immortals but he was apparently in ECGTB but was cut out later. I haven't seen ECGTB in years, so I don't remember if he was in it or not. Any clarification on that would be helpful to me. I need to correct the filmography!

> Finally, if you don't bother to read alt.fan.tarantino (you're better off for it ;-) I found a post that was real long about Pulp Fiction. The final statement in the post was to the effect that 'The guy who plays the Buddy Holly waiter played Mr Blonde in Reservoir Dogs.' I immediately posted correcting the person. Some people will never learn about who Steve is.

You think that's bad, I had some guy tell me that Steve was the guy in the Got Milk? commercial (of course, it's not -- it's Sean Whalen). Anyhow, they don't even LOOK alike.

Kym



Subject: Re: Steve directed commercials
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 18:14:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marni Hager

On Fri, 12 Sep 1997, Rebecca L. Webb wrote:
> I've seen IMMORTALS. My best guess is that someone was confusing it at some point with KING OF NEW YORK. IMMORTALS features Eric Roberts as a crime kingpin who gathers a bunch of "losers" to pull off a big score. KONY features Christopher Walken as a crime kingpin who gathers a bunch of "losers" to pull off (and so on and so on and so on). The films really aren't that similar, though.

I saw _King of New York_ ages ago. There was nothing even remotely redeeming about that movie. Not even Steve. *sigh* As for _The Immortals_, that actually wasn't half bad. And it was neat seeing Dermot Mulroney's brother, Kieran, for the first time. I really liked his character. I don't know how anyone could get the movies confused. My feeling is that people are saying: "Here's an independent movie, therefore Steve has to be in it somewhere." Ok, maybe not. Any other theories besides these two?

Marni
  Home   |   Archives