|
[MORMONISM. The Faith of the Twenty-first Century. Volume 1. Edward K. Watson. (Liahona Publications. Copyright © 1998 Edward K. Watson.) p. lxxxvii. MORMONISM: Series Introduction. All rights reserved.]
My view of the Bible
I view the Bible to be “Scripture,” written under divine inspiration, meaning, God's will guided its creation. However, I don't believe God “dictated” the Bible. Neither do I believe each book was written by its alleged author. I accept the scholarly consensus of multiple authorship of various books such as the Pentateuch (J, E, P, D, & R authors), Second Jeremiah and so forth (but not a sixth century Second Isaiah),1 and the environmental milieu for numerous biblical concepts. I also accept the scholarly consensus that many biblical books were edited soon after their creation.
On the other hand, I view the theological teachings of the Bible to have greater continuity, unity and harmony than most scholars because of my belief in their divine inspiration. For me, the “pseudo-” authors wrote under inspiration and the editors wrote under inspiration. I view the entire canon as Scripture. For me, it isn't important who really wrote Titus or Second Peter. I don't view the teachings of the different books as deriving from conflicting schools of thought, but of being complementary, despite originating from diverse groups.
The MORMONISM Series views and treat the Bible as a whole, with doctrinal consistency. Consequently, the different books are treated as different fruits from the same tree. It examines the biblical doctrines, and doesn't isolate the doctrines written by the Hebraist, the Deutero-Paulists, the Deutero-Johannines, etc. This is why references from different periods and different authors are grouped together when there is doctrinal bonding, even if the concepts aren't explicitly identical, and even though the NT text reflects kerygmata instead of a single kerygma.2
I repeat, my approach is to take the doctrines of the Bible as a whole and view conceptual similarity as grounds for doctrinal unity despite particular citations may elucidate a precept more than others.3
[ENDNOTES]:
1.For reasons that are explained in MORMONISM: Section 18.
2.See UDNT. pp. 11-32,374,377,386.
3.Scholars who wish to object to particular linkages should always keep this methodology of mine in mind.
|