To the sizzling, brooding, depraved demons who also read them, looking at every word to trip me up, I say "Be warned. This is not a game. This matter is deadly serious, and you would be better off spending your time contemplating why you are being annihilated, rather than trying to find ways to put me down. You will not win. You cannot win. You are the fawning fools of a passing parade in the Counterfeit creation's vanquished parody. The more you abuse me and mine, the harsher will your end be!"

Do not underestimate the fears which are gripping the staunch Deniers of what is going on, especially the ontological Zionists. They, being favoured sons and daughters of the controlling Darkness have the most to lose. They really do show their stupidity when they say nothing is happening. Even if one does not want to believe the Final Correction is upon us, the least astute, with the slightest brainpower, would know we have problems on this planet - big problems and unprecedented ones for which we have no answers in the normal context of where and how we find answers! That is why Amitakh and I have been charged with giving the information we give. Whether you think it is valid or not is your business, but to deny anything at all is happening is really stupidity and condemnable foolishness.

However, in the light of the many revelations we have had, I now go beyond this and no longer identify Deniers simply as ignorant fools. I really perceive them to be what they are: Demons of Darkness, and that is because the most mentally blunted fool would have to know that something most serious is happening. It takes an active, malicious force to deny the Reality of Correction and such a force arises from the fear deep within demons, realizing that they are about to be engulfed by Truth, finally!

Mega-Moron of the Month Medal for August goes to Richard Butler the malicious Zionist (he is also a Jew by the way) who is head of the UN team to find some reason why the genocidal sanctions against Iraq imposed by the USA and Britain should not be lifted and why Iraq should be bombed anew. In orchestrating new false evidence in the form of VX (gas) tainted war heads, seven years after the supposed event, as he has been paid to find, Butler and the US administration are morons for thinking sane people will believe their lies. Butler is to share the shame implied in this award with the US administration, and not the least with persistent fornicator Bill Clinton. The depths of their duplicity and evil are almost unfathomable, however as all evil ones are cursed by their own evilness, how do you think they will end?

Inspite of trouble brewing in the usual places, it feels very much like the lull before a big, big storm to break around the world. Indeed if you have this feeling you are perceiving accurately. This poxed world is a bag of disasters that will happen, very, very soon.

Much of this newsletter is taken up by correspondence following the revelations of last month about World War 2 which many readers appreciated very much. The facts were new to many.

The more the Zionists attack me and my work, the stronger will my retaliation be. They cannot win. It is only a matter of time before they are totally spiritually eradicated from the face of creation for they are immutably evil to the core. However, on this level, as they crawl back under their rocks, we will return the newsletter to its previous format.

NOTICE: If you still owe money to Annwn Publications, please send it now. New batch of poetry books printed. Order your copies now!!

One of the greatest tragedies of this plane - still unavenged - has been the ability of Zionists (ontological, not racial) to charge a True Son of God, Jesus Christ, as a blasphemer, and assassinate Him! Here in one instance you see how they turn Darkness into artificial Light, how they change black into white and v.v. There are many, many examples in history and these examples prove beyond doubt that this is the Plane of Darkness, Deception, and Perversity, and is very, very, evil. Hence, its eradication is mandatory.

In the last newsletter, I quoted the following from Adolf Hitler: "The birth of the man, who is celebrated at Christmas, has the greatest meaning to us, the National Socialists. Christ was the greatest protagonist of a struggle against the worldwide Jewish enemy. He had the nature of the most superb fighter who ever lived on this Earth. I will conclude the work of Christ which he could not finish."

Have you ever asked yourselves this question?: "How could the man the Zionists and their history books call the most evil man who ever lived be so loving towards Jesus Christ?

Can these two things be reconciled? Of course not! His evilness is a myth, for no man can truly love Christ and want to carry on his work against evil and still be Evil. We know from the little accurate history that is available that Hitler was reasonable in his dealings. Yet the Zionists paint him as a madman, just as they did Jesus 2000 years ago.

We know Hitler refused to target civilians unlike the British and the Americans, until he was forced to. We know he had poisonous gas but, unlike the Allies, refused to use it in war. We also know that he was overcome by the Evil machinery of Nazism which took control and did many despicable things. So what happened was that Hitler the man and his life were overpowered by Evil Ones and stopped from expressing the way he wanted to. The Evil others did what was then equated with him and the monster stories of Victor's history have had no limits.

A second example in living memory is Iraq's Saddam Hussein. For all his supposed Arab-style atrocities, this man created modernism in a backward country. He prospered and was treacherously considered a "Golden Boy" by the USA and its duplicitous CIA, so he could be used to stop Iran which the US demonized after it lost control of its oil pilfering mechanisms via the Shah in that country. According to the CIA and USA, Saddam's character changed overnight, from the best of Arabs to the worst of Demons when he was no longer of use to the Zionists controlling the USA and the West. Can one really change so much so quickly? Of course not. Can all those people in Iraq really be threatened to show unfettered loyalty to Saddam and their country in the face of genocidal threats from the US?

The West's propaganda machine has continued non-stop to demonize this man, and would continue to do so, even if Christ himself vouched for him in a public forum now, for the propaganda belongs to the Anti-Christ essence and would oppose the True Christ also.

The demonization of Libya's Colonel Gaddafi began when he dared to take back his country, and its oil wealth, from the rapacious and murderous Westerners who sent his indigenes into excruciating poverty. He has worked a miracle for his country and people only to be repaid by demonization by the West, by illicit bombings on occasion and sanctions which are murderous. He and Libya have been subjected to unmitigated evil. His crime, as I said, was to right wrongs and fight for Justice. But the greedy Zionists did not like it and never forgave him for stopping their process by which they stole Libya's oil. They do not want justice for anyone. They want unlimited profits and gross exploitation of all but themselves. Therein lies the mechanism for their own destruction.

Of more recent times we have the demonization of any who fight for justice being labelled "anti-semite" and/or terrorist. Palestine is a classical example. When the murderous Zionists bombed whole Arab villages and killed thousands upon thousands in the first half of this century in that unholiest of lands which, as an indication of the perverse nature of this plane is called the Holy Land, they were labelled freedom-fighters by the press which they controlled and still control. And they considered themselves to be liberators of a feral land - clearing the land as a farmer would clear grazing land of shrubs and tree stumps. These Zionist terrorists who were strongly opposed by most of the indigenous Jews of Palestine were, and are, terrorists of the first Order. And yet when the Palestinians objected and tried to fight for their lives, their land, their children, for justice, they were labelled as "anti-semites" even though they themselves are semites. They were branded as terrorists to be slaughtered at will.

Hence, since then, we have had, as you now know, the holding pens of the West bank and the Gaza strip, the rape and destruction of Lebanon, the confrontation of children with stones and rocks in their hands by Israeli soldiers with machine guns, the decimation of a people, the forced genocide of an Arab country, all resulting in the Palestinian HOLOCAUST!

And yet, the evil rats have been able to use their propaganda to paint the weakened victims who plea for their existence as the terrorists against freedom. Just who is the terrorist?

This ability, to twist facts so the Untruth is presented as Truth, so the innocents, murdered and suppressed, can be made to look like the unlawful ones, is a hallmark of Evil, and by it, all of evil stand condemned. There are many precedences in history. Many Gnostics were slaughtered as vermin by the Catholic church even as they isolated and sought a life of ascetism and peace. They were painted as evil by evil ones, making them in all reasoning, the Light ones persecuted by Darkness. It is for such reasons that I write that those of Evil are cursed by their own Evilness.

It is NO coincidence that I have used Jesus, Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi and the opponents of Israel as examples. I will explain further, in due course, in the future, if a need still exists.

While I have highlighted the Zionist element in these examples, realize such elements exist all over the globe, not just as racial Jews. Thus, the Zionism of Australian rulers against the Aborigines is of the same essence, as it is in the Indonesian one against the East Timorese, the Americans against its Indians, the Canadians against its natives, and so on. Wherever we see suppression of Truth, of freedoms, of peoples, of individuals, we will find the yoke of Zionism as the tool by which the evil demiurge - known as Jehovah, YHWH, Yaldabaoth, Saklas, Satan, the Devil - in his last incarnation - unjustly rules!!

I have identified the Zionist consciousness as being of the anti-Christ Essence, many, many, times. From the hallmarks of evil I have identified in them, in their mechanisms, in their lives, they could be nothing else. Again I ask: "What then is the essence of those such as the above I have mentioned who opposed it, in their way, in search for some justice on this plane?"

Those who know of our progress know they have attempted such demonization of the author and his friends.

In order to make sense of the madness which exists in this world, in order to remain sane when all are succumbing to the Terminal Madness of the Endtime, you must reduce, as a first principle, all units of consciousness to their ontological essence. Indeed, existence has a metaphysical basis of fundamental importance, and you must engage in this reductionism in order to see through the obfuscating mechanisms of Evil which turn Truth into hues of Unreality and Illusion. The creation of monsters then is just such an example.

Look beyond the monster-creating propaganda of the Zionists and perceive the essence of individuals and groups. *Now do you see why I, and many others, have said the Children of Darkness, of the Lie, these demons and their sycophantically programmed robots, twist the Truth into Untruth and v.v., that they paint black as white, and white as black?

On Economics: Finally, do not equate free market economics and the blustering removal of national parameters with freedoms. They give the cartels and multinationals, which represent the pillaging rapacious Zionists, the advantage they yearn over less evil, exploitable ones. These are very much a form of financial rape, which reduces the majority of the indigenes to utter poverty, while they are mercilessly exploited by those who know best how to exploit and subjugate populations for their own selfish, very evil benefits.

Conquering Zionists give themselves the freedoms to move into countries and take all they can, greedily, leaving the people all the worse for their actions.

Whatever infrastructure improvements they make, or demand of the countries in which they invest, are for their benefit, for the more efficient extraction of goods and resources they require to maximize their profits. As we saw in Indonesia, Russia, Chile, especially, and in all the collapsed Asian Tiger economies, they are not for the people at all. If their plans benefit the people, that is an unintended side-effect as far as they are concerned. But in this obvious mechanism of greedy plundering is the mechanism of their own self destruction, for as the indigenes become poorer, and as the country struggles under the weight of the resources exploitation it undergoes, the exploitative gains become limited by the inability of the indigenes to gain some measure of justice. Or else, they become so impoverished they cannot buy the goods that are produced so cheaply. The system then collapses on itself for the exploitative monster the Zionists have created can no longer feed itself.

The cycle cannot be never-ending for there is a limit to which nations will allow themselves to be abused. We saw it in Germany pre-WW 2, we saw it in Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, the Asian tigers, etc., etc. We will see it in Russia, China, and the rest of the world soon enough. The NAFTA agreement, hailed by Clinton as so praise-worthy, has been about this sort of exploitation. $15 per hour jobs have been lost in the US as the work moved to 80 cents per hour factories in Mexico where the absence of organizations to look after workers' interests has meant gross worker exploitation. Under this system, only the exploiters win. But, for how long will they win?

No matter how, or for what reasons, monsters are created for relentless exploitation - be they individuals or mechanism such as NAFTA, the World Bank and IMF raping schemes, their evil creators and their evil mechanisms eventually come to no good, for they are based on Evil, and that is the moral of this short piece.

Note that I am giving you certain information and asking you to judge its worth for yourselves with no pressure, no coercion, no threats. But the hatemongers, like Hatewatch, the Gnostic Society of Norway, and other Zionist Groups, want to censor everything they do not like. They are worse than Nazis. They show the intolerance of demons. If they really wanted a free world where all rights were respected, they would respect my right to write what I want to write in reasonable terms, and your right to accept it or reject it. At least I give you the option to choose. They want to take that option away from you too. By the way, no one except demons has ever said my writings were unreasonable or of no great assistance in explaining what is going on in this doomed, fragmenting world.

Zionist responses to my essay "Truth, Zionists and Jews", consist of personal attacks on me for daring to write such a thing and for reiterating the charge made by many others throughout the ages of the evilness of Zionists. Their accusations of anti-semitism continues, inspite of the substantial explanations I give. Not one argument to disprove the facts I gave has been offered. That is because they have no way of disproving them. They are defeated, all but dead, and very much doomed! They are hatemongers, hateful, of turgid Darkened minds, as many of you have experienced with your own dealings with them. How could such a corrupt, depraved system really continue?

But even more letters were so supportive. It is wonderful to see so many being assisted by our words. Many non-Zionist Jews wrote and I have published some of their letters in this section. Thanks to all those who wrote, faxed and emailed an opinion. I know you understand why I cannot publish all the letters.

SM writes: Hello. I just read your July newsletter. It is great, great, great. Another nail in evil's coffin. Another resounding victory for Light, Truth, and Good. Thank you so very much.

M.J. writes: "Dr C, I absolutely love the section of NL 23 `Truth, Zionists and Jews', I think it is brilliant! I think this is the best article on the topic that you have written to date in such a brief, concise form. Could you possibly post this as an Essay of its own right in the essays section of your website? I would like to see it indexed to the WWW so that it cannot possibly be overlooked by anyone."

E.D.McN wrote: Thank You Doctor. Your answers to todays' problems are so RIGHT ON. I was told that I would finally know the meaning of LIFE, when I was 15 years old and begging for an answer to the world's woes. The terrible suffering, sorrow, ... I have NEVER believed that A TRUE GOD would be that vengeful toward's his "chosen ones". I was and am still today an outsider to humanity, I have never fit into the fabric of mankind. For years I told my husband that I was ashamed to be a human.

I was led to your website and it was no accident. Your words put everything I had been learning and dreaming about into perfect, precision perspective. My life is now changed and it all makes such perfect sense. You have answered most of my questions. Your words are music to my ears. THANK YOU! Thank you Doctor. I cannot thank you enough. Now I really understand the fight. I was right all along ... I had figured out about the energy and how the negative beings actually feed off of your energy. Your words clarify it all so beautifully. May we leave this mess forever ... and soon ... I have been waiting for this release for eons. Good Luck and God bless You, Evelyn D.

Sol Goldman of Miami, Florida, USA writes: Dear Dr. As am American Jew, I am ashamed of the Zionists you so well identify. I have been aware of their antics in our race for a long time and have seen others working the same greedy way. I think the more the Zionists call good people who speak up "anti-semites", the more will we all see the Truth of the Zionists being evil, and the ones they try to stifle, the ones who do tell it as it is, as being heroes. I've tried objecting in my own way, and am abused by most fellow Jews, and most of my family, as a traitor. I'm glad I'm not like them.

Dr C, I found newsletter 23 a very educational read. The articles that you included were very interesting. My understanding of many of the events that transpired throughout the world wars, was minimal at best. You have a remarkable ability to convey information that is easy to assimilate and understand. The Annwn Newsletters make it only too painfully obvious, how little truth and facts are available in this world, and how useless much of the knowledge and learning of this world really is.

J. M. Victoria, Australia

Luc S writes: Your newsletters really enlighten, inform, energize and stimulate me intellectually. ... I'm glad you devoted so much of July's newsletter to the evil lies and injustices of Zionism. I've been angry lately about what continues in Israel, the injustice, arrogance, Naziism, and genocide of the Palestinian Holocaust, perpetuated by Israel. Your frank and justified exposures of Israel and its Zionist leadership and ideals sure help me and others. Thank God someone tells the truth and makes the Zionists eat their own filthy lies and behaviour. Thank you, Thank you, Thank you! We can't get enough of these truths. They have gone untold for too long. ... All this food for thought is very nourishing for minds starved almost to death on lies. I don't care what your detractors say ... A person can't make informed choices with no information. I'll be the judge of what's correct for me. Hatewatch doesn't tell me what to think ... Thanks again for all the good energy.

Dear Dr. Chiappalone,

As a Jew, I was ECSTATIC to read your newsletter #23 of July 1998. I remember as a child my father's love of the simple, honest non-Zionists Jews, and his (to me) seemingly incomprehensible vehemence against certain other Jews, who only later did I realize were evil Zionists. He absolutely hated their cutthroat dishonesty, and their deal making at shul (synagogue). In fact the guy who had a business next to my father's was one of those liars, cheats, and swindlers, and my father was always afraid to leave his shop because he knew that guy was wanting to burn down his own business to file a fraudulent insurance claim. I never understood all of these forces at work when I was younger. My father never explained it to me because I think he was so torn and troubled by the evilness he saw in the most successful (evil) Zionist Jews but didn't have an answer for it since the Bible made the case that Jews were all so good and special. He was a quiet man and didn't speak much but he was troubled by that all his life. Even now I know that many people in this world are naive about the existence of evil especially in those who are close to them, for many reasons, not the least of which is the conspiracy to cover up the truth of people's spiritual natures of good or evil.

There is a popular song on the charts here in the United States now that goes "I don't care what you did or who you are, just as long as you love me." Many people I am sure would say that it didn't matter what their parents, children, brothers, sisters, or other family did, because they are family and you have to stick by them. I am sure many Jews, Christians, and Moslems believe this, but it is a lie. Analogously, they also are very naive about other members of their religion or what their nation does (especially Israel).

I am sure they think that as long as someone has the same religion or beliefs then they are okay. That is such a great lie. My father was able to see the difference and would have nothing to do with the hypocrites, liars, cheats, and bastards (I am sorry to use this word, it was the only curse word my father ever used and he used it only for the Zionist Jews). They really are bastards, as you have pointed out, as even the Bible (John) says. My father knew that they were not his kinsmen in any way, shape, or form. He knew them as his spiritual enemies, and enemies of goodness, truth, fairness, decency, honesty, and justice. He despised them and practices. Only now as I have come to this understanding with the aid of your writings am I able to finally understand who these evil golem (demons) really are.

I am so very happy for your enlightenment on this most personal subject that I cannot even find the words to thank you enough. All I can say to others out there, whether they are Jewish, Christian, Moslem, atheists or whatever, is that if you have ever wondered why there were such hypocrites, liars, cheats, and swindlers in your midst (which includes some of your elders and rabbis and teachers and ministers, and evangelists) this is the answer. You just know that there is something so false and worthless about them even if you can't tell why. If you have ever wondered whether you were bound by some religious code to accept these evil ones as brothers or sisters (spiritually) then please listen to what Dr. Chiappalone has written. The answer is NO, you are not bound. It is the answer and the only true answer that makes sense to me. I would like to thank you Dr. Chiappalone for your truthful help and guidance in the most profound spiritual matters with answers that nobody else provides. I wish you the best, with love.

And now, for an opposite view: This is the standard of material I am getting from sick people of the "Clever Country", Australia (no doubt from a Zionist):

Subject: HA, NAZI, SCHMAZI
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 18:59:48 -0500
From: robert verdon <agp@alphalink.com.au>
Organization: Aberrant Genotype Press
To: jstac@internetnorth.com.au

Hi Saw you on HateWatch - are you some Nazi fuckbrain Hanson supporter? Remember that your capitalist parasite system is dying. yours Ginger Spice (Lesbian)

Editor's input: And some of you wonder why I am 100% for destroying this depraved, noxious Hell as quickly as possible!!

Dear Drs. Chiappalone:

I just completed reading your July 1998 newsletter. Stunning facts and inspiring advice. As support to your essays, I will try to briefly give an account of some of my own experiences. In 1970, when I was 21 years old, I served in the US Army and was stationed in Germany. My wife and I visited the memorial at Dachau, which is reported to be a full-scale replica of the work camp (only the Zionists could name such a horrible place a "camp") in a small town about 5 miles northwest of Munich. When I stepped upon the ground, my whole body vibrated and was repelled by this prison. I walked through the display in silence and refused to take any photographs of it. I cared not whether Jews or Gypsies had suffered and died there, only that they were people. I knew that during WWII the people of my state had sent Americans with Japanese surnames into similar prisons and confiscated their property. I could see no difference in kind in the treatment of the American government of its Japanese citizens and the German government of its Jewish, Polish &c. unwanted or despised citizens. I did see that there might have been a difference in degree of horror, but the same architect obviously was running both the USA and Germany. From that point on, I began awakening, ever so slowly to the stench that runs this planet. I became decidedly misanthropic in my viewpoint, thinking that man was the problem. While in Germany, I frequently saw signs of protest, which often stated, "Ami go home!" For a long while those signs confused me, until I realized that I was a member of an occupying force. Upon realizing this I was shamed. Now, many years later, having discovered the horrors that the USA has inflicted upon the world, shame is too soft of world for what I feel for what my country has done to its own people and the world at large. As additional information to show Churchill to be a monster, as if your account needed any, one need only consider that he knew in advance that Coventry, England was to be hit by a German bombing run. Leaving the city fully exposed to be slaughtered, Churchill refused to notify the people of the city of approximately 300,000 of the bombing because he did not want to compromise his secret information gathering device (cryptographic gear called Enigma). The bombing of the unprotected, unsuspecting city resulted in horrific casualties. The ruse worked; the Germans could not imagine that anyone would be so monstrous as to hold out the city for destruction if he knew of the attack. The Germans believed their Enigma transmissions were totally uncompromised. The Germans misunderstood how vile Churchill was.

I must say that Amitakh's column was exceptionally helpful to me in these trying times. You have addressed issues that have troubled me ever since I began speaking out. Evil uses tactics of confusion on me, and preys upon my weaknesses, which it knows all too well, to send me into depression or feelings of hopelessness. Your inspiring words give yet another tool to keep focused on my job with fervor and vigilance. It was as though the words were written directly to me. I know you understand what I mean.

Steffan Bertsch

Recently I wrote this to one who was involved in a Gnostic notice board on the web: Subject: Annwn on Gnostic-Life and Gnosis. Hi Mike, Glad you are getting a bit of fun from it all. Now you see how these demons see black as white and v.v. They have no metaphysical understanding and argue in the arrogance of their ignorance. Had they read my complete works, they would have half a chance of understanding what I write. But they will never accept it because that would mean admitting who and what they are.

I have gone to great lengths to talk about the consciousness of Zionism and not the racial Jewry, for example. Can they see the difference? Of course not!

I could go through each point, but why bother? Notice they use distorted history to assert the veracity of distorted history. How can one argue with such fools?

Strange they should call me a chilianist by which I assume they are trying in some way to connect me with Christ's energy expectations. They are close, but not close enough - and I am sure they mean it pejoratively. I don't have to pretend to be anybody. Those who can "read" my energy know who I am and need no explanations.

Keep well, but realize if you are caught arguing with fools, some might take you as one.

The bottom line: They are at a loss to explain why everything is occurring as I say it will. Why don't they argue about that, instead of their misunderstanding of my crystal clear writings? Bye for now. JC

PS I have never heard from the Norwegians although I did send an email for them to explain where my writings are anti-Semitic. Hence, they are lying on that point too!

The sort of things Zionists are objecting to:

Here are some points from emails I know the evil, mendacious Zionists are objecting to. In many cases they twist and misrepresent what I write, in order to serve their nefarious purposes.

From: Rhyner, M. H., USA: "Dear Joseph and Amitakh, A lot has happened since my first letter to you in which I asked if there was anyone who wanted to start a mailing list based on your teachings. Since I found no posts about your material on usenet, I wrote a short note to the Gnostic-Life list. I knew it would be controversial, but had no idea of the demons I would stir up! I stood back wondering "what kind of monster hath I created." After much name calling and venom spitting, the list has finally calmed down. I thought you'd be interested in seeing the results.

Here is my original post: "Ultimate Gnostic Website. I am sorry to hear of the demise of the Gnostic list. I have learned so much from it and will be sad to see it go. Before it goes, I wanted to tell you about what I consider to be the most important site on the net. I consider spirituality and health to be the most important subjects that one can study so for the last 25 years I have spent most of my spare time studying these subjects. (I'm 45) 10 years ago I discovered Gnosticism and it made a lot of sense to me, but I put it aside and got lost chasing my tail in a maze of New Age and Christian mumbo jumbo."

"Last October I found and purchased the book: "Making Sense of the Madness" by Joseph Chiappalone MD. It is a completely different way of looking at reality and showed me why I kept being deceived despite leaving no stone unturned in my search for an understanding of existence. So I am writing this to let others know and to get other opinions to see if it resonates with others as it has with me. The web addresses for Annwn Publications: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~jdm or http://www.cybertune.com.au/~annwn/ or do a search for "Annwn Publications"

"Dr Chiappalone has appeared on the paranormal talk show "Sightings" 4 times, and I strongly recommend that everyone listen to at least the first program to quickly get an idea of what his info is about. You can connect to these interviews at the above address. (Both addresses go to the same site.) The host of Sightings, Jeff Rense, said that no other guest has generated so much interest and excitement as Dr Chiappalone. The Sightings website is:

www.sightings.com.

"The first reply is from Terje in Norway who is with your `friends' at the "Gnostic Society of Norway." I'm sure you know of him, seeing your comments about his society and he said that he has written to you. Here is his venom:

"Re: Ultimate Gnostic Website: Just a word of warning, of course the shit will hit the fan majestetically (sic) when I have offered it, but consider it carefully. You complain about New Age and Christian mumbo jumbo, so be it, but presenting Joseph Chiappalone (the "doctor") as a kind of champion of authentic Gnosticism is a little pathetic after whining about "Christian mumbo jumbo". The man is an anti-semittic bigot who seeks to use abstract and metaphysical interpretation of diverse Gnostic and non-Gnostic material (he cannot see the difference between the two) as authencification of his own racial hatred. I personally wouldnt touch his stuff with a ten foot pole, sorry, maybe im a little prejudiced against Anti semittic neo-nazi "mumbo jumbo", just as you haven't really understood what Gnosticism is all about if you thrust the Doctor to your chest. (His book) is the most warped, paranoid and hostile worldview I have stumbled upon in a long time. You have my condolances.. may you eventually find something that really is worth your invested enthusiasm. Why the bloody hell bother with the fellow - it makes me wonder what kind of listeners the program get, the next generation of Heavens Gate candidates? Here`s a little list of Chiappalone`s Gnosticism: (Here come the gripes - editor):

"What the Zionists did with the Ancient Wisdom and various manuscripts at the time of Jesus, and before, and for some 4 centuries after they murdered him, they did to the truth of most other Avatars, including Moses, Zoroaster, Buddha, Manichaeus and even Mohammed. Today they are doing exactly the same thing with this section of history they want to call the Holocaust. But they only fool themselves, and the other fools who are the demons and robots of this dimension. But it does not really matter when the spiritual bottom line is reached, for they, being spawns of the Celestial Error, are all being corrected in a way they dread the most - in the manner of Divine Justice!" Dr. J.S Chiappalone

"Chiappalone, in one sentence here - presents himself as a chilianist, a fundamentalist, a supporter of the most famous trends of the New Age movement (avatars etc. quite different religious figures, divorced from their cultural, etnic and religious contexts - presented as the saints of the doctors own synchretic religion), a Holocaust revisionist and an anti-semite."

"As for utter ignorance, take a look at this: "Some 3,000 years ago, the special race created by Jehovah, called the *Zionists* , began plagiarizing information from others and then distorted it into a spurious version, claiming it to be their own history, calling it *"The Old Testament"*< TDB:see my comment,please>. For "special race" reads "especially *evil* race". There is no doubt of their evil covenant with the evil Jehovah however. Acting as secretive elements in a new movement (spuriously called Christianity, which it is not, of course) again started by Jehovah after the assassination of Jesus, these same Zionists rewrote most of the so-called *New Testament*. "

[My Comments: This demon then goes in to a diatribe of obfuscating nonsense using distorted logic and distorted history to support his own view and at the same time exposing completely his lack of understanding of metaphysical events. I will deal with each point separately for these arguments are bound to come up again in due course as these demons vainly try to cover the Light I shed with their Darkness. - editor.]

Terse, turgid Terje continues: "Now, do I really have to say anything? The Jews are not responsible for the so-called "Old Testament", what is referred to as the Old Testament, as a norm, is the Septuaginta, the hebrew scriptures of quite differentiated nature, from historical accounts, chronologies and legends to prophetic, apocalyptic and formal religious literature - translated into Greek, compiled in the 2nd century BC in Alexandria on the order of the graeco-roman hellenistic emperor at that time, because of his interest in the increasing jewish population in his realms, especially in Asia Minor and Egypt."

"To say the semites are only 3000 years old is tauntamont to operate with a world history that begins only 5000 years ago, a timeframe only Fundamentalists hold with today - to be so untrained in the history of religion, whilst passing oneself off as a "MD" and "Doctor", shows an incredible little knowledge with the subject matter one has chosen for oneself."

"Chiappalone dehumanizes the entirety of Jews on this planet when he calls them the "spawn of the devil (in effect, Ialdabaoth, in a Gnostic context, would, to the uninitiated appear to be a devil in the Luciferian or Satanic variety), an artificial race of demons and "robots" created by the anti-God of Chiappalone`s cosmology to mislead us."

"... with rewriting the New Testament (...) and plagiarizing the so-called "Old Testament". When it eventually was called "Old testament" was around the 4th century when a Canon of so-called "authentic scriptures" for the Christian religion was compiled, it is "Old Testament" only in this context, in the Christian context, and it is show of great ignorance if one tries to project such ordering into Hebrew scriptural and cultural heritage, that predates the formal establishment of any "bible" as such - the Torah contains only the 5 mosaic texts, none of the prophets, none of the psalms - yet some religious books are used in complemention to the Torah... but they do not have the same status as the Torah."

"The Old boy has plans: Quoth Dr. Chiappalone in his latest newsletter:

"This makes me wonder - have we another Heaven's Gate on our hands, eventualized by this person, who has no credibility, and whose teachings does not even touch upon spiritual issues of any kind? Pax Pleroma.

Terje Dahl Bergersen noetic@online.no"

[My Comments: In one last attempt of a desperado, this demonic fool - he could be nothing else - reveals he is as blind to the Light, and to Truth, as any vanquished demon from Hell. How can he, in his total stupidity and Darkness, even dare to judge the worth of my material when he obviously has not read 99% of it, and has obviously, in his rage, misunderstood the little he has read? And some wonder why the end is being expedited!! - editor] The original email was sent by Mike with this ending: "I'm having a fun time with this. With Love and Respect, Mike Rhyner".

On Friday, 17 July 1998, this was received from Philip & Kris Murrell:

Dear Sir,
Over the past few months I have exchanged e-mail with people using the name and address pmathews@Devine-Pearson.com. Having worked for some years as an editor (therefore being very familiar with the way different personalities express through writing) I am sure that at least two or three different people have composed messages to me using this same name and e-mail address. The writing style and content of the messages have varied markedly.

Does this not demonstrate a concerted effort to fraud and collusion by these Zionists? Interestingly, these Zionists have totally ignored the key concepts of Spiritual War and Spiritual Survival and have selfishly focused solely on their holocaust which they defend fanatically. Having failed miserably to 'convert' (programme, pollute, and indoctrinate) me to their way of thinking about this, they have recently resorted to attacking the character of Dr Chiappalone. A case of not liking the Message and trying to shoot the Messenger, it would seem.

However, each message received from these people and their ilk merely serves to further expose their Evilness and demonstrates further why the whole show has to go!

Kris Murrell

Betty N. writes: "Hi. Thank you for the latest newsletter. Each one seems more and more powerful in exposing and destroying evil and opening our eyes to the Truth. There is so much info, I often feel my mind is a sieve since I can't contain it all. Thank you for them. They are our life's nourishment. I've finished Volume 5 of the Poetry. They are each a pearl of wisdom. As I review them now from the beginning, I feel I need to start again as they are a new experience each time. I continue to be awestruck by their beauty and love within them and the fact that they assist me in breaking down the programming of this plane. I continue to work on overcoming all fear, surrendering to the Divine.

FROM THE NEWS

Continuing the series I had started in Newsletter #23 from The Jewish Mentality Book I by Michael A. Hoffman II.:

A productive investigation for an enterprising historian would be the pursuit of the following line of enquiry: to what extent did the Zionist Jewish leadership encourage Hitler's violent anti-Jewish policies and to what extent do they encourage or actually themselves commit violent attacks upon Jews today? Rabbi E. Schwartz, writing in the N.Y. Times of May 18, 1993: "To achieve their goal of statehood the Zionists have always deliberately provoked anti-Semitism. Their interest was not to save Jews, on the contrary, more spilling of Jewish blood would strengthen their demand of the nations for the creation of their state."

Why would Zionists want to assist violent anti-Jewish opposition? Perhaps they understand well that Jewish propaganda requires violent opposition to Jewry and synagogue and cemetery vandalism, in order to expand their influence and power and where none exist they either incite it by means of their control of Hollywood-style, neo-Nazi front groups, or they perpetrate the actions themselves.

2         Just Law Enforcement, Not Persecution

Jewish murderers, kidnappers, rapists, usurers and those engaged in treason and subversion can be executed by the civil authorities upon indictment, prosecution and conviction in fair criminals trials operated within the safeguards of the common law jury and appeal process. The critical point is that they would be executed not because they were Jewish, but because they were murderers, rapists, kidnappers, usurers, traitors and subversives. Moreover, non-Jewish usury bankers, loan sharks, murderers, rapists, kidnappers and abortionists are even more culpable than Zionist crooks and killers, since the non-Jewish criminals are additionally guilty of betraying their own kind. These would most certainly be liable to a death penalty for their crimes.

In this way the ruling class, arch-criminals in the masonic and corporate elite who seek to escape justice when Biblical forces come to power, on the basis of their skin color or claims about their naivete,' will be foiled. The Pharisees could never have gotten to first base in their push for the reign of Anti-Christ were it not for their allies among the masonic and corporate overclass--nearly dynastic families who are attempting to impose a police state for the benefit of bankers, lawyers, Zionists and their "Aryan" cronies.

Legal executions of Pharisees who are guilty of crimes cannot be considered as "violent opposition" to Jewish people because these actions would be meted out uniformly, without regard to race or creed, on the basis of crimes committed by any malefactor. Hence the punishment is a legal rather than a vigilante function of the civil powers who, according to the Bible, "bear not the sword in vain." There will be those who will ask, "Why accord Jewish killers - or any other killer for that matter - benefit of law? If we know they are culpable, why not just initiate summary executions?"

History teaches that such vigilante acts always degenerate into a witch-hunt against innocents with whom the vigilantes have private scores and vendettas to settle, and who exact their revenge by means of lumping their personal enemies into the general category of "enemies of the people." Such actions are the hallmark of the French Revolution and Bolshevism, and of Oriental despotism and Latin American societies - forms of corruption and cruelty which are inimical to Biblical and European yeoman values.

In a key exchange attributed to Sir Thomas More by Robert Bolt, More answers the objections of his hot-headed son-in-law, Roper, who urges him to use his position as Lord Chancellor to eliminate his enemies: "Mrs. More: While you talk, he's gone! (A reference to More's dangerous personal enemy, Richard Rich, who has just left the house). More: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! Roper: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law!

More: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? Roper: I'd cut down every law in England to do that. More: Oh? And when the law was down and the Devil himself turned 'round on you--where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast ... and if you cut them down - and you're just the man to do it - do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake."

In the preceding dialogue we observe the ethos later exhibited by the American Revolutionaries of 1776 who were successful in winning and sustaining a revolution based on justice and equality before the law. Khazars (whenever you see this term - think Zionist - editor) cannot legitimately claim persecution under such a system of just law and enforcement. Indeed, it is the integrity of just such a system which distinguishes our values and way of life from those of Zionists, Oriental despots and banana republics.

Hitler's techniques has been harnessed today in America to the ends of the contemporary corporate, capitalist state and exhibited at great profit at every stadium-sized, "rock muzak" concert and every "Super Bowl" and "World Series." If there is any genuine, potent, corporate "neo-Nazism" extant today, it exists on the rock stage or the pro sports field, where the same sloganeering, and submission, as was witnessed in the techniques and adulation accorded Hitler and the Nazi party, are put in service of the American capitalist system. But whereas at least Hitler did these things in the name of his nation and indigenous culture, American corporate fascism exists solely to enrich a gangster class of money grubbers. And lest it be thought that we imagine that only Jews grub for lucre, the lessons of our literature, from the American Mrs. McTeague in Frank Norris' McTeague, who out-Jewed the Jewish ragman in avarice, to the Englishman Monks in Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist, who outdid Fagin in villainy, and Mark Twain's townful of crooked hypocrites in Hadleyburg, are all reminders that we are not to imagine that white Aryans possess any immunities from evil or that Jewish persons possess any monopoly upon them. (Again here you should think of ontological Zionists - editor).

But the key here is that by casting themselves as hunted fugitives from Christian vigilantes, the Jewish psychology has been able to blackmail humanity into tolerating the Jewish invasion of Palestine and the displacement and murder of its people, along with control of, or inordinate influence over, the money and mass media of every Western nation. In truth Jewish operatives have controlled the governments of the West for decades and in some cases (Great Britain for example), centuries. If we look deep beneath the hoodwink we observe that it is the non-Jewish dissidents who are the victims of the supposed "Jewish martyrs."

When a Jewish professor of philosophy from Louisiana State Univ. attacked the late anthropologist Joseph Campbell as an anti-semite, he phrased the attack not in terms of the quest for the truth about the nature of the Jews, but in terms of how Jews are "disparaged" by Campbell. The Jewish professor said that Joseph Campbell, "invariably disparaged Judaism as literalistic, chauvinistic and parochial--stock anti-semitic epithets." (NY Times Dec. 2, 1989, p. 26).

In other words, Campbell is wrong because he spoke truths that "disparage" Judaism. These truths are identified as coming from a "stock" of epithets that the writer identifies as being hateful or anti-semitic. But since it is true that Judaism is parochial and highly chauvinistic, how does it become grounds for censure when these truths have been known for hundreds, even thousands of years and form a body of traditional Western observation upon the Jews which the Jewish writer seeks to delegitimize by terming them "epithets?"

Another phenomenon at work is the assumption that Jews themselves have no framework of hate within their own tradition, no "stock epithets" for Christians. Anti-Christianism isn't even a recognized term in the English language. To defend one's Western heritage and point to the stock epithets of anti-Christianism prominent in Judaism, is to practice hate, according to the received opinion of our day.

Jews absolve themselves of much of what they accuse others of. Syndicated columnist Joseph Sobran states:

"... There is no hyphenated cussword in general use to stigmatize hostility to Christianity ... Leon Wieseltier can call a cross on a convent at Auschwitz 'sickening,' and nobody condemns him ... Israeli soldiers can beat up a priest on the West Bank, then shoot up his church during Mass, and only the Catholic press takes note ... If Christians had done such a thing to a synagogue, anywhere, it would have been front-page news, everywhere. (Wanderer, Oct. 12, 1989, p. 7; National Review, March 16, 1992, p. S-5).

Indeed, in the fabrication of so-called, in the dreadful Newspeak of New York Times-ese, "hate speech" law codes, law makers deliberately design them with the concept of silencing critics of Jews on the assumption that only the critics of the Jews are capable of hate; the supposition being that Jews are immune to hating or if they do hate, their hatreds must be excused in light of the "Holocaust." Michael Thomas, writing in Hanover Place, states, " ... these days there seems to be quite a few people who shout 'Holocaust!' when given a parking ticket."

Let me repeat that:- editor: [" ... these days there seems to be quite a few people who shout 'Holocaust!' when given a parking ticket." ]

Timothy Danson, a Canadian constitutional lawyer, advocates laws for the suppression of critics of Judaism: " ... the concept of freedom of speech does not entail the protection by the courts, of malicious lies." (But, it does, it does!! - editor)

Here we see the axiom that anyone who criticizes Judaism is a liar. This is a totalitarian position and makes the Jews divine in the way the European monarchs and Chinese emperors were regarded as having "Divine Right."

Danson goes on to say, "Anti-semitism does not fall within the category of ideas or opinions that ought to be protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The anti-semite has chosen hate ... and therefore he need not concern himself with truth or reason."

This Canadian lawyer is saying that to criticize Judaism or Jews is an act of hate. Because he is totally steeped in the Jewish version of the world this lawyer cannot conceive of the possibility that Judaism might be a tyranny and to criticize tyranny is liberation.

This Canadian Constitutional lawyer states that opposition to Jews cannot be grounded in truth or reason. That is to say, according to Mr. Danson, it is irrational and mendacious to criticize Jews or Judaism. Here we see the creation of a special category of immunity for Judaism.

But the question springs to mind, what of Jews who criticize or hate Palestinians or Christians, are they also insane sadists and criminals who must be dealt with by Canada's "criminal justice system"? (And what of non-Zionist Jews who criticize Zionist Jews? - editor)

Mr. Danson has the answer: "History speaks of the bloody persecution of the Jews over the centuries." In Mr. Danson's world-view, carefully imbibed from the official history of the Jewish version of education and information, only Jews suffered a notable "bloody persecution." Palestinians and Christians are cast only as the villains, never the victims of Zion. (Canadian Jewish News, Aug. l8, l988, p. 9).

The psychiatricization of the issue is a commonplace. Kenneth Stern, the American Jewish Committee's expert on "hate groups" (they mean gentile hate groups since Jewish supremacists and terrorists are not included) and author of A Force Upon the Plain: The American Militia Movement and the Politics of Hate regards the militia, a Second Amendment constitutional phenomenon, as "the eruption of irrational behavior." They are also "paranoid" and possessed of a "deteriorating mental state." (Cf. N.Y. Times, Feb. 12, 1996, p. B-2).

Funny, but this writer knows of a nation of people who have made a religion out of paranoia. In fact Stern's book is filled with page after page of warnings about an "impending pogrom" against - guess who? History is more than the records that issue from the official sources and the monopolies on academic investigation. The founding leadership of the communist movement in Russia responsible for the slaughter of 20 million Christians, was predominately Jewish. The mass murder of Palestinian women and children by the Israeli army and air force is a modern example of Jewish atrocities against non-Jews. This slaughter was aided by the Soviet communist Jews who in 1948 smuggled weapons to the Zionists in Tel Aviv using Czechoslovakia as a conduit. (Christian News, May 31, 1993, p.7).( Again I remind you to translate Zionist in the place of the word Jew - editor.)

One of the bloodiest butchers of Russian Christians was Leon Bronstein, a Jew who later changed his name to Trotsky and was the first commander of the communist Red Army. Trotsky's great, great grandson, David Axelrod, resides in Israel where he terrorizes Palestinian civilians just as his great, great grandfather terrorized Russian Christians. In November of 1990, Axelrod shot to death an elderly Arab couple who were on their way to pick olives in a village near Nablus (Village Voice, Nov. 20, 1990, p. 30).

What is also very interesting about the term anti-semitism which has escaped analysis is that the use of the phrase is itself an instrument of hate since it is a means of equating a person with being "insane," a "criminal" and a "sadist." Persons thus labeled are subject to the loss of employment, housing and civil and human rights.

What is the definition of an anti-semitic act? In so serious a crime, the felonious conduct should be clearly indicated. In spite of much palaver to the contrary, the definition is much akin to the logic of the Red Queen of Alice's Wonderland who said that a word was "Anything I want it to be." Someone is an anti-semite simply by criticizing Jews, Judaism or the Israeli state. In other words, for doing anything that Jews deem offensive. For example, when journalist Patrick Buchanan criticized the Jewish role in the formation of U.S. Middle East foreign policy, Abe Rosenthal, contributing editor of the N.Y. Times, compared Buchanan to Nazi soldiers who forced Jews into the Warsaw ghetto! (NY Times, Sept. 27, 1990, p. 14). The term anti-semite then, applies equally to the murderers of Jews as to the critics of Jews.

Professor of Literature Hugh Kenner in a letter to W. F. Buckley: "The points on which I agree with Joe Sobran are

"It is surely evident that such as he will never be satisfied by anything short of a casting of whoever annoys them into outer darkness, and I think it is a mistake to let them control the terms of the discourse. 'Anti-semitism' - has no stable meaning; it can run all the way from gas ovens to a mere wish that Abe R. would moderate his frenzies. And a term that has no stable meaning is simply not a profitable head for rational discussions." (National Review, March 16, 1992).

It is questionable whether Kenner's statement would even be allowed once Orwellian "hate speech" criminal codes are fully developed and enforced. Any kind of deep, critical thinking analyzing matters such as who sets the terms of discourse and what the phrase anti-semitism actually means (nothing) and is used for (to silence original thought), are slated to be criminalized. Kenner's reasoned attempt to decide what are the grounds for "rational discussion" would be labeled as "irrational" and "sadistic."

The defense against Prof. Kenner's thoughts must be in terms of the denunciation of a heretic, a "criminally insane hater" who has the gall to deny the True Faith of Absolute Belief in the Infallible Goodness of Judaism. The superstructure of piety is erected over the framework of debate. The state religion of the otherwise agnostic, terminal West emerges - the Church of the "Holocaust" - cloaked in the moth-eaten, dusty, ermine robes not used since the coronations of popes, czars and emperors.

High Priest Eric Breindel of the NY Post announces that "after Auschwitz, express hostility to the essential Zionist endeavor on the part of a Western intellectual requires an explanation." (NY Post, Jan. 16, 1992, p. 27).

The Los Angeles Times decrees the fantastic dogma that public criticisms of Jews are precursors of a Holocaust. (L.A. Times, Feb. 6, 1990, p. A-5).

The association of a stench with condemnation of Israeli murder and dispossession of Palestinians effectively stops any further clearheaded analysis of the terms the NY Times has established for dealing with Israelis. By the same logic, Cambodians must be immune from condemnation if they murder and dispossess ethnic Chinese and Vietnamese in Cambodia, because they too are "survivors of a holocaust" who are "establishing a haven in the only state in which Cambodians form the majority."

According to Prof. Irv Abella, "The Holocaust metaphor being used against Israel is a group libel ... " (Canadian Jewish News, Dec. 26, 1991, p. 4). Apparently Jews have a copyright on the word, a proprietary relationship that forbids its application to the mass murders the "holy people" themselves perpetrate upon mere Palestinians.

That we are dealing with a religious impulse rather than merely a debate between competing ideas can be seen in the fact that the believers in the Church of the Holocaust are unable even to imagine an alternative view. Joseph Sobran in his published debate with William Buckley:

"An anti-semite' in actual usage, is less often a man who hates Jews than a man certain Jews hate. The word expresses the emotional explosion that occurs in people who simply can't bear critical discourse about a sacred topic, and who experience criticism as profanation and blasphemy. The term 'anti-semitism' doesn't stand for any intelligible concept. It belongs not to the world of rational discourse, but to the realm of imprecations and maledictions and ritual ostracisms." (National Review, March 16, l992, p. S-5).

Sobran's epigram about anti-semitism being more properly defined as a man Jews hate, is corroborated by the knowledge that when Jews heatedly disagree with one another they sometimes call each other "anti-semites." When Michael Bar-Zohar of the Israeli Labour Party voted for religious Jews to be subject to the Israeli army draft like all other able-bodied young Jews, he was called an "anti-semite" and a "Nazi" by members of the Shas and Degel HaTorah parties in the Knesset. (The Jewish Ledger, April 2, 1992, p. 24).

When Israeli Prime Minister Yithak Rabin chose to recognize the Palestine Liberation Organization in Gaza, his Jewish political rivals produced posters showing Rabin dressed in a Nazi uniform. Later this "Nazi" was murdered by a fellow Zionist. It is fitting that in this most stupid of all ages, when man has become puffed up on his own supposed scientific grasp of the universe he presumes to have mastered, that we should witness the crowning self-mockery of this creed of rational modern progress, in its enslavement to the racist, superstitious religion of Judaism, to which all good citizens of the One World Utopia must make obeisance or stand stigmatized as "anti-see mites," a species akin to that of an insect. The insect analogy is apropos. The former chief of staff of the Israeli armed forces, Raphael Eitan, referred to the Palestinian people as "cockroaches scurrying around in a bottle."

The Blood and Soil ideology of Zionism which has violently dispossessed the native Palestinians of 92% of their land and which guarantees immigration only to Jews, is racist to the core. Equality between Arabs and Jews in the Israeli state is a fiction. Yet, according to the N.Y. Times, to say that Zionism is just that--organized, nationalistic racism-- "remains code language for bigotry." (NYTimes, Sept. 24,'91).

By N.Y. Times logic it is an act of bigotry to point out that Zionism constitutes bigotry against Arabs. This is the Jewish mentality par excellence.

They've internalized their chauvinism to such an extent that they are literally incapable of objectivity or dispassionate examination of their own foibles, pretensions, myths and legends. And the idea that speaking out against the racism of Zionism, is some form of racism, is a palimpsest of fraud. Beneath the branch of Zionism is an even more unlovely tree, the ferocious hate-mongering at the very heart of the religion of Judaism.

Only a nation of infants who have been spoon-fed the pablum of relentless Jewish propaganda would question the reality of Judaism's race-hate doctrines. Jewish hasbara (propaganda) is first and foremost based on brazen lying, the more outrageous the better. Though they have accused Hitler of the Big Lie technique they are themselves the chief practitioners of it. In addressing the Jewish leadership, Christ said they were, "Of your Father, a murderer and a liar from the beginning." (John 8:44).

When gas chamber doubter Bradley Smith placed a series of nationwide advertisements in college newspapers for his views, Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz rushed to respond, denouncing Smith nationally in print as a "known ... anti-Black racist." This was a complete lie made up out of thin air. Said Smith, "So far as anti-Black racism goes, in all the stuff I've written over the last 20 years I've never written a word on that issue. It can't even be argued. It's a complete invention ... They make any accusation that comes to mind, confident that media won't try to find out the truth of the matter." (Smith's Report, Dec. 1991, pp. 2-3).

A few years ago National Public Radio (NPR), a taxpayer financed enterprise, championed the cause of 72 year old David S. Rubitsky, who claimed that only "anti-semitism" was keeping him from receiving the Congressional Medal of Honor for having single-handedly killed more than 600 Japanese soldiers in a battle. According to Rubitsky, he fought off waves of Japanese soldiers in all-night fight and saved his battalion. He said Japanese bodies were "piled like cordwood." He told reporters: "Some were still alive. Some I just hit in the shoulder and couldn't move. Some in the legs. So I would just shoot them and bayonet them, shoot them and bayonet them. I was a completely insane man."

As soon as NPR and the NY Times discovered that there was a Jew who was not getting the highest military award, that magic explanation for all Jewish troubles, "anti-semitism," was summoned. The Times and NPR reflexively played the hound to the U.S. Army's hare. As it turned out, Rubitsky's account was conclusively proved false. Rubitsky's evidence, a Japanese inscription on a photograph, was judged by both military experts and historians in the U.S. and Japan to be "100 percent...a forgery."

However, since this was a Jew the media were dealing with, the NY Times conceded that, "In a reflection of the delicacy of the matter ... Army officials and members of Congress were careful not to portray Mr. Rubitsky as a deliberate liar ... simply an honorable old soldier with a foggy memory." (NY Times, Dec. 16, pp. 1 and 14; Dec. 17, 1989; also cf. Researcher newsletter, vol. 3, no. 5, p. 1). Indeed it must have been a very foggy night out there in the Pacific.

One wonders if the perpetrator of this little yarn had been an aging, hillbilly, good ol' boy from north Alabama, what pyrotechnic paroxysms of pointed media indignation would have been directed at his church, his culture and his community?

The same "foggy memories" applied in the Israeli trial of Cleveland auto-worker John Demjanjuk, where several Jewish "eyewitnesses" swore, without a trace of doubt or shadow of uncertainty, that Demjanjuk was the infamous "Ivan the Terrible," gasser-general of Treblinka. Demjanjuk was convicted and sentenced to hang on the strength of these "honorable old" Jewish "eyewitnesses." Only later did researchers working for his family prove that Ivan the Terrible was long dead and Demjanjuk was not him.

To say that some Jews are known for telling lies is not wrong if it is the truth. But the Jewish response is not to argue the point, but to categorize it and place it in their mad panoply of pathology. In the Jewish mentality, to indict some Jews for a crime of which they are guilty is a form of sickness. Hence to say that some Jews are known for a propensity to lie, will not evince an admission from Jews that the Congressional Medal of Honor seeker was a fraud, as are many so-called "survivors" of the "Holocaust."

But rather, the Jewish response is to say that accusing Jews of lying has been part of the "familiar libels" and "stock charges" of history. No real defense is offered, only the demand, based on the prestige and media clout of the Jews, that they are to be believed and their critics silenced and reviled. Elemental discourse with Jews becomes impossible under such circumstances because Jews insist on non-negotiable absolutes: that they are, by divine right, God's master race, and that traditional Western Civilization's portrayal of them as money-mad, liars and extreme racists is always wrong.

This Jewish stance necessitates an investigation into what Jewish tradition holds about Western Christian civilization and Gentiles in general to determine if it is Western tradition that is wrong and Jewish tradition blameless, or whether there may be something evil within ancient Jewish tradition. That we have the right to sift Judaism for evil traditions is certainly a turnabout of fair play since leading Jewish spokesmen have been condemning Western traditions as evil since the rise of mass communications. Denying us the right to sift their tradition for evidence of evil and criminality while they do it to us constantly, is the Jewish mentality in action.

Take for purposes of citation, the New Testament story of Jesus chasing the Jewish money-lenders out of the Temple. If we suggest that there might be a co-equivalent in our time of Jewish capitalists robbing the economies of the West, Zionists will condemn the point not on the basis of fact but by screaming "anti-semitism" and trotting out their shopworn cliches about "reeks of a stench of bigotry," "an accusation worthy of medieval inquisitors" and other similar linguistic devices intended to avoid debate on the merits or lack of same of the accusation. Yet the facts speak for themselves: nine out of ten of the people indicted in Wall Street insider-trading securities' fraud are Jewish. James B. Stewart's 1991 book about the chief Wall Street money-changer crook of our time, the Khazar Michael Milken, is aptly titled Den of Thieves. The sad fact is that, whether 2,000 years ago or now, some Jews have an innate propensity for crooked financial dealings.

This is admitted privately by the Jews themselves. Chaim Bermant is an orthodox Jewish columnist for the national Zionist newspaper Jewish Chronicle based in Britain. In his writing of March 1, 1991 he upholds the observation that Jews are essentially dependents who must prey on a productive people in order to survive. Chaim Bermant asks:

" ... why are Jews wildly successful at making money everywhere else in the world except Israel? In Israel there are no Gentiles, i.e. no suckers waiting to be got the better of. Where everybody is on the ball, how can anybody score goals?" This is the truth about Israelis from the mouth of a Khazar himself, whose opinion carried enough of the ring of authenticity, to be repeated in print in a major Jewish newspaper. Yet if you or I repeat this truth we are subject to invective and even prosecution.

Yet I maintain that many Irishmen have a propensity for alcoholism, many Germans for petty bureaucracy, many Americans for mindless Babbittry, many Scotsmen for parsimony and many Englishman for homosexuality. Whether I am right or wrong in these characterizations should be argued on the basis of historical fact and statistical analysis, not hysterical screaming and laws intended to criminalize one's thoughts and writings. In fact, though Irishmen, Germans, Americans, Scots and English might not like what I have to say and might counter forcefully with facts and figures of their own to dispel my conceptions, few of them would seek to pass laws to imprison those who hold such uncomplimentary views, probably because deep inside, these Irish, Germans, Americans, Scots and English know their own worth as great peoples who have led great civilizations.

(More of these extracts next month - editor).

And my O my, was Clinton not a big, big man to tell the Chinese off about their abuse of Human Rights, in China, in front of the whole world, while he was an official guest there on June 27? No! I am being facetious. He was not a big man at all. It is a very clear sign of Terminal Madness of the Endtime affecting Clinton and the US administration. Does he think the Chinese do not know about the abuse of Human Rights by the USA?

What he has done here in metaphysical terms is drawn a line in the sand and demarcated on which side of it the two blocs stand. They are opposites. This sort of insult is not one the Chinese will forget readily. They will not forget it at all. If the Chinese nuclear warhead missiles were not aimed at the USA before, you can be sure they are now!!

China has suffered abominably over the last few centuries at the hands of the Colonialists and the Japanese. It has many, many reasons to bomb them, bomb them all, in due course. Here is a very short list of Invasions of China: In the 4th Century the Mongol Invasion, consisted of various groups of pastoral nomads, both Mongolian and Turkic, under no centralised command. For the next 280 years, North China was dominated by invaders from the steppes. There was a succession of short-lived dynasties, some by the Hsiung-nu, some by Mongolians, some by Turkic tribes, by the Avars and by Tibetan tribes. From 386-534, the Toba, a Turkic people, succeeded in re-unifying Northern China. During this time, the nomadic invaders adopted Chinese customs, literary culture, and political institutions. The Chinese upper class collaborated and intermarried with them. These aristocrats later set up the Sung dynasty. During the 10th century, China lost control of the North Eastern area to the Khitan (Liao), who had set up an Empire in Manchuria and Inner Mongolia. In the North West, another kingdom was set up by the Tanguts in Ninghsia and Kansu.

In 1126-27 the Chin, who had replaced the Liao in the North East, overran and conquered all of Northern China. The Sung emperor survived only in control of Central and Southern China and was constantly on the defensive.

Genghis Khan in 1211 invaded the Chin Empire of Northern China. Peking fell in 1215 and the invasion ended in 1234, after Genghis's death, with complete destruction of the Chin Empire. The final conquest of China was conducted by Kublai Khan. After the conquest of the Southern Sung, Kublai became the first foreign ruler of all China. The Khan had no confidence in the natives and put all authority in the hands of Tartars, Saracens and Christians. The Yuan, the name given to the Mongol dynasty, lasted less than a century after the conquest of the Sung. The first Ming emperor reigned in 1368 when the last Yuan emperor escaped to Mongol territory.

In 1449, the Oirat tribe of Western Mongolia, under their leader Esen, launched an invasion against China. After an initial victory just outside the Great Wall where they destroyed the Ming army of half a million men, they moved South to Peking where, after several defeats, they withdrew. In 1419, the Japanese in twenty ships carrying several thousand men, attacked the Liao Tung peninsula. In 1439, forty shiploads raided the Cheking coast. From the mid-sixteenth century onwards, these raids developed into full fledged invasions.

It was not until the 1560's that specially trained Chinese defenders and massive armies stamped out the invaders. In 1592, Japan's unifier, Hideyoshi, moved his army into Korea as a final step in a march to Peking. They soon overran the whole Korean peninsula, but were beaten back to Pusan. Hideyoshi brought in a second wave of troops, which was no more successful. The death of Hideyoshi in 1598 hastened the Japanese complete withdrawal. The cost of this empty victory made it easier for the growing Manchu power to conquer the country 50 years later.

Portuguese first appeared in 1514 and from 1517, were permanently established in Macau. Manchu troops entered North China in 1644 at the request of a Ming general who asked for their help in defeating Chinese rebels. The Manchu crushed the rebel forces and forced them out of Peking, and then refused to leave. During the next 20 years the Manchu, under the dynastic name of Ch'ing, concentrated on overcoming resistance from the various Ming princes and other scattered forces. In 1683, Ch'ing naval forces took Taiwan. They were now in control of all China.

Russian encroachment on the Amur river was fought off and a favourable settlement obtained. This was the first treaty with a Western Power. Dutch outposts in Taiwan were taken by a loyalist Ming general in 1661. Manchu armies entered Tibet in 1720.

By the early 19th century, the Manchu dynasty was at the point of collapse, militarily, politically, financially. "The economy of China in the early 19th century was severely strained by the need to produce enough for 350 to 400 million people, resulting in a lowering of per capita production, and the standard of living. Perhaps the most fundamental problem was a delusion of cultural superiority."

"The totality of Confucian institutions, enthusiastically promoted by autocratic emperors, produced a closed-circuit civilization which constantly searched the past for the future. Its response to challenge was to harden time-honoured attitudes rather than adapt to new ideas and situations. Such Western concepts as the search for profit in foreign trade, risks taken with accumulated capital, credit utilization, and legal protection for investors, were beyond the comprehension of Confucian scholar-officials who considered the profit motive, evil, commerce undignified, and industry a minor compliment to agriculture. The application of 6th century B.C. concepts to a crumbling 19th century empire would have resulted in economic disaster even without Western intervention."

The English and the East India Company had been firmly established in India in the 17th century. After 1763, the East India Company began direct rule over Bengal, whose OPIUM found an increasing demand in China. During the mid-eighteenth century, the British empire developed Tea as a national beverage. Tea soon produced most of the Company's profit. Tea, silk and porcelain, the major imports from China, had to be paid for in silver. The company found it more profitable to make payment in opium. All Western trade at this period was restricted to the port of Canton, where trade was controlled by officially appointed "hangs". With the advent of European trade, a group of hangs banded together to form a Cohong and, through bribes paid to officials, maintained a monopoly. In 1793, permission was requested by the English for trade in other places. Permission was denied.

In 1834, after the East India Company's monopoly was abolished, the British Government sent Lord Napier to negotiate with Chinese officials, who refused to recognise the British as equals, and Lord Napier countered with force. His frigates did not overcome the Chinese blockade, and a compromise pressured by hong merchants prevented the incident from escalating further. Now the Canton control system no longer worked, as neither side had effective representation in dealing with trade problems, and it became a paradise for smugglers. A high percentage of the smuggled goods was opium.

From 1800 to 1820, 5,000 chests of opium were imported into China. From 1820 to 1834, 22,000 chests, and from 1834 to 1838, 40,000 chests of opium were imported into China. This was a bonanza for English traders, for it not only paid for tea and silk, but earned increasing amounts of silver.

In the 1830's, China began to suffer a silver shortage and inflation. The economic pressure and moral stigma compelled the Emperor to prohibit the import and use of opium. In 1838, he sent an official to Canton to enforce the edict. The official burnt 20,000 chests of opium brought in by British traders, and after being refused delivery of a sailor accused of murdering a villager, the British were driven out of Canton. Hostilities began in 1839. The superior British fleet with up-to-date weaponry soon overcame resistance, and the invaders blockaded the China coast, sailing to the port of Peking. In August 1842, the Manchu court signed the first of a series of unequal treaties with foreign powers.

The Treaty of Nanking included the ceding of Hong Kong, the opening of five ports for British residence. In trade, the promise of a fair and regular tariff was made and the payment of a huge indemnity. Such humiliation inspired the people to express their resentment forcefully. In 1850, Hung Hsiu-ch'uan, the Tai-p'ing, began a rebellion lasting until 1864. He almost overturned the Manchu dynasty. In this and another revo