Caesar's Challenge 2000
-Results-
As one might have expected, Roman armies made up a quarter of all entries, ranging from Polybian to Patrician. Chinese armies are beginning to make an appearance in decent numbers with four different lists being used, while Warband armies declined steeply from last year - only two (Gauls & Suevi) showing up.

Place

Name

Score

Army

Date

No.

Opponents

Scores

Countback

1

Stone, Peter

38

Early Carthaginian

500BC

27

25,38,15,2

8,10,10,10

92

2

Watson, Charles

36

Han Chinese

9AD

29

4,6,13,39

10,10,6,10

93

3

Watson, Marcus

34

Chin

209BC

13

24,35,29,22

10,10,4,10

109

4

Robins, Mark

30

MI Roman

296AD

12

26,39,10,17

10,0,10,10

72

5

Wade, Nick

29

Hsi-Hsia

990AD

35

17,13,33,30

9,0,10,10

84

6

Pooley, Damian

29

Palmyran

273AD

8

18,9,36,6

2,8,10,9

77

7

Sharp, Ian

28

Seleucid

190BC

2

37,31,11,27

9,10,9,0

91

8

Jackson, Daniel

27

LI Roman - East

330AD

18

8,15,16,1

8,1,9,9

84

9

Macaulay, Jason

26

Bosporan

100AD

15

9,18,27,38

8,9,0,9

102

10

Ossa, Martin

25

Caroligian Frankish

814AD

39

34,12,22,29

10,10,5,0

112

11

Frost, Geoff

25

Abbasid Arabs

838AD

22

10,19,39,13

10,10,5,0

93

12

Lynn, Jared

25

Sassanid Persian

493AD

5

28,33,1,3

5,6,4,10

54

13

Jackson, Andrew

24

Nikephorian Byz.

975AD

19

14,22,34,7

10,0,4,10

71

14

Nelson, Hamish

22

Polybian Roman

200BC

21

40,3,30,34

6,6,5,5

75

15

Jenkinson, Gavin

22

Han Chinese

100BC

37

2,23,40,10

1,7,4,10

66

16

Morgan, Martin

21

Gallic

56BC

6

16,29,24,8

10,0,10,1

94

17

Jackson, Steve

21

Sui Chinese

600AD

17

35,32,28,12

1,10,10,0

81

18

Shaw, John

21

Rus

971AD

34

39,20,19,21

0,10,6,5

75

19

Metcalf, John

20

Seleucid

320BC

30

36,40,21,35

5,10,5,0

82

20

Gillies, Keith

20

Early Ach Persian

480BC

40

21,30,37,16

4,0,6,10

74

21

Smith, David

20

Patrician Roman

467AD

11

23,7,2,-

9,10,1,-

50

22

Stubbs, Richard

19

Polybian Roman

210BC

38

1,27,31,15

8,0,10,1

94

23

Melville, Doug

19

Marian Roman

105BC

24

13,26,6,24

0,10,0,9

90

24

Tibby, Che

19

Maccabean Jewish

148BC

1

38,25,5,18

2,10,6,1

90

25

Williams, Jason (NSW)

19

Parthian

90BC

25

27,1,4,23

2,0,7,10

78

26

D'Costa, Peter

18

LI Roman - West

394AD

9

15,8,23,28

2,2,6,8

75

27

Bertram, Paul

16

LI Roman - East

388AD

26

12,24,14,31

0,0,8,8

71

28

Walters, Mark

14

Nikephorian Byz.

990AD

3

33,21,7,5

5,4,5,0

70

29

Pooley, Chris

14

Hunnic

450AD

7

32,11,3,19

9,0,5,0

68

30

Upton, Django

13

Graeco-Bactrian

250BC

4

29,16,25,32

0,1,3,9

75

31

Knowles, Simon

12

LI Roman - West

400AD

28

5,36,17,9

5,5,0,2

75

32

Walliker, Andrew

11

Marian Roman

30BC

36

30,28,8,24

5,5,0,1

80

33

Del Munns, Brad (NSW)

11

Later Ach Persian

343BC

31

20,2,38,26

9,0,0,2

67

34

Waligora, John

11

Norse Viking

820AD

14

19,10,26,20

0,0,2,9

54

35

Daymond, Lyle

10

Viking

866AD

10

22,14,12,37

0,10,0,0

88

36

Jackson, Robert

10

Later Carthaginian

209BC

16

6,4,18,40

0,9,1,0

81

37

Hills, Darryl (NSW)

10

Suevi

406AD

32

7,17,20,4

1,0,8,1

52

38

Wouters, John

9

Uighur

999AD

33

3,5,35,bye

5,4,0,bye

68

39

Harvey, Glenn

8

LI Roman - West

312AD

23

11,37,9,25

1,3,4,0

79

40

Silk, Andrew

4

Alex. Macedonian

329BC

20

31,34,32,14

1,0,2,1

53

"Countback" is calculated by summing the scores of all opponents for that player. Its represents  a good measure of difficulty and is used to separate players on tied final scores.