Since the time I was in prison I began planning how I would flee my native
land, Zanzibar, if and when I would be released. When I was let out of
jail on 12 January 1972 I began the task of searching for a passport. It
was not an easy task, They kept pushing me about from office to office,
from person to person, until ultimately I had a friendly tip: "It would
not be easy for you to get a passport at this time." When I heard that
I began casting my nets about. On 7 May 1972 (one month from the time Karume
had been killed) I committed myself to God, and fled the country accompanied
by two companions, Sheikh Muhammad Ali Abbas and his son Ali Muhammad.
At that time so soon after the assassination of Karume leaving the
country in any way was extremely risky, but we decided to put ourselves
in the hands of God Most Merciful. At nine p.m. on 7 May we left Zanzibar
by canoe. By dawn we entered one of the fishing villages on the coast
of Tanganyika. We said our morning prayers in the village mosque, and then
had breakfast of tea and some buns in a village coffee shop. We waited
for the bus which was going to Tanga via Pangani. At about eight the bus
arrived and we embarked. When we got on the bus we saw a young Zanzibari
in the company of a young Tanganyikan who was wearing the dress of Tanu
Youth League. The Zanzibari was known to me since we were together in the
Langoni prison. He was then serving sentence for having had sex with a
cow. He met us well and we sat with him until we reached Pangani.
When we reached Pangani and as we were having lunch the young Zanzibari
came to our table and told us: "That youth who was sitting with me has
been stationed in these areas to watch for illegal immigrants and smugglers
of cloves. He told me he was suspicious of you and wanted to take you to
the police station of Pangani here. I have begged him not to do so.
But he says he wants your identity cards, so give them to me and I will
show them to him."
We told him that we did not take any identity cards, as we never
thought it necessary to do so when we were traveling within the same country.
The young man pretended to be going to report to his partner. He kept on
moving from us to him, when all that he wanted was that we should give
him something. All of us had only a total of Sh.1000. That Tanganyika youth,
according to what the Zanzibari told us, was expecting us to pay him Shs.
1500 for the three of us. Even if we wanted to pay that amount we could
not have done so because we just did not have it. Then we launched into
haggling over the amount we should give. The haggling took all the time
we were traveling from Pangani to Tanga. At the end of it we gave them
Shs. 50 and all the trouble ended.
When we reached Tanga we were received by a dear friend of mine whom
I had come to know when we were in Langoni prison together. That brother
of ours had been imprisoned for smuggling cloves. He was born in Tanga
and that was where he was living. After arriving there our escort from
Zanzibar returned home We remained there making plans to enter Mombasa,
Kenya. Our host here received us with great warmth, and gave us all the
assistance we needed, and even more than what we needed.
As a result of the assassination of President Karume a very strict
watch was imposed at the Tanzania/Kenya border so much so that some men
from the Security Department of Zanzibar were present on the Tanzanian
border before entering Kenya. Our friend engaged himself in searching for
ways and means for us to leave, and everywhere he met with insurmountable
difficulties. He went to the extent of getting us membership cards of Tanu
Youth League and that we belonged to the Wadigo tribe born in Tanga. All
this did not help, so tight was security on the border at that time.
In his endeavour to find means for our safe crossing he got one of his
brothers who was an expert in following bush trails from Tanzania into
Kenya. One day in the morning he came with his brother and told us: "If
God wills it I can get you across to Mombasa through the bush. But for
those unaccustomed with such ways it may be difficult, for in fact there
are no roads at all, it is all bush country." He went on to tell us that
there might be game rangers whose job was to protect animals from poachers.
It might happen that if they saw people at that time they might put them
into trouble. If they were tipped something they let them go.
"If you are prepared to bear such difficulties, then I agree to go
with you and I don't want you to give me anything. What you will have to
pay is the bus fare upto the place we shall start our journey through the
bush."
We thanked the young man for what he told us and we told him: "We
are prepared for anything that will take us from here to Mombasa."
The young man said: "Tomorrow, then, about eight at night we shall
leave by taxi to go to the bus station which comes from Dar-es-Salaam on
its way to Mombasa. Give me therefore the taxi and bus fares." We
gave him the money willingly and with pleasure.
The next day at the stipulated time the young man accompanied by
our host came. After saying bon voyage to our host we got into a taxi and
drove to the bus station. On arrival our escort took us to a restaurant
to have a meal. As we were eating he went out and came back hurriedly and
told us: "Let us move quickly, stop eating!"
We were amazed and thought perhaps the bus had arrived. When we got
out of the restaurant the young man stopped a taxi and ordered the driver:
"Take us to Amboni." We went straight to Amboni. There the young man told
us why he had so hurriedly got us to leave the restaurant.
He said: "When I got out I saw three young Zanzibaris sitting
outside. I happened to have seen them before, and I suspected that these
were among those who spy on Zanzibaris trying to get out of the country
this way. Hence I thought it would be better to leave as quickly as possible..
We will stay here until the bus arrives. When it arrives you will find
all the passengers disembark and walk across the bridge on foot. The bus
will cross empty. After crossing the bridge the bus will stop and there
the passengers including ourselves will get on to it. I have already made
arrangements for the reservation of our seats."
The young man went on saying; "Further on when you see me stopping
the bus and descending you also descend."
At bout ten thirty the bus arrived at Amboni and before crossing
the bridge all the passengers got down, and we joined the other passengers
and crossed the bridge on foot and then got on to the bus. At about two
at night we saw our escort stopping the bus. When we saw him getting ready
to get down, so did we. We stayed for a short while, and then the young
man said to us: "The journey that I told you about starts from now, so
let us pray to God." At that time the moon was shining very bright. We
began getting into the bush without any fear or suspicion. The boy Ali
was very young at that time, but he was tough and bore very well all the
tribulations of the journey.
At about four in the morning our escort told us: "You see those lights
on our right? Those are the lights of a police station on the Tanzanian
border."
After walking for another two hours he told us: "The lights you now
see are those of a police station on the Kenya border."
After a time he told us: "Now here where we are is the land of Kenya."
When he told us that we raised our hands above and thanked God Almighty
for enabling us to escape from Tanzania safely and to enter Kenya. We believed
that if by any misfortune anything happened to us here where we were we
would be in the hands of a government which recognized human rights and
appreciated the rights of political refugees.
About six in the morning we entered the suburbs of Mombasa, and after
having a breakfast of tea and buns in a village coffee shop we waited for
a bus to take us to Mombasa. We arrived at Mombasa at about eleven in the
forenoon. That young man who escorted us all the way from Tanga bade us
farewell after our arrival at Mombasa and returned to Tanga. It is
difficult to describe how deeply grateful we were to this young man for
his kindness and great daring. If anything went wrong it would have been
he who had sacrificed his life for our safety. God alone is the One who
would repay him and his brother our host at Tanga for what they did in
enabling us to escape from Tanzania.
When we arrived at Mombasa, the first thing we did was to look for
our brother Maalim Wazir bin Ali who had preceded us in leaving Zanzibar
and who was waiting for us at Mombasa so that we might leave together for
Arabia. When we arrived at where he was staying his hosts told us: "He
waited for you for a long time, when he saw you so late he thought it better
to go. But he asked us when you arrive to receive you and to be with you
until the time of your departure.."
In fact we were sorry to have missed our companion, but we had no
alternative but to remain there until we could leave for Arabia. We are
thankful to Allah, and we are grateful to our Mombasa hosts, for they did
indeed look after every need of ours.
After staying there for several days, all of a sudden one day as
we were taking a stroll along Salim Road, now called Digo Road, I came
into contact with my brother-in-law, Sheikh Muhammad Soud Bashir. Both
of us were caught by surprise. For a time each just stared at the other,
and then held each other in an embrace. There and then he took us to his
home where we met with our sister, Bi Zuweina Muhammad Rashid. Bi Zuweina
was also pleasantly surprised to see me. She never expected to see me,
particularly as they had heard of the wanton arrests of people in Zanzibar
after the assassination of Karume. She could not control herself and could
not resist the tears of joy that flowed from her eyes. After exchanging
emotions and well-wishing we began arguing over their request that we move
to them from where we were staying. We did not think it proper to tell
our hosts that we would be leaving because we had found our relatives.
We agreed in the end that we should not leave all of a sudden, but should
gradually broach the subject until we came to a mutual understanding. And
that was what happened. We talked over the question of our moving out gradually
and we shifted to our relatives with good will on all sides. We kept on
paying friendly visits to our original hosts from time to time to
see how they were.
From the first day of our arrival at Mombasa we began looking for
ways to go to Dubai. First of all we submitted ourselves to the representative
of the United Nations Refugee Commission, Sheikh Salim Muhasham. He received
us warmly and gave us a one-way travel document from the Immigration Department
of Kenya. He also helped in everything needful. Having got that document
our stay in Kenya became legal.
After a stay of four months at Mombasa, God facilitated my
departure from Kenya to Dubai. It was agreed that I should precede my two
companions. I left Kenya on 29 September 1972 being assisted with an
air ticket and some pocket money from the United Nations High Commission
for Refugees (UNHCR).
At about eight p.m. on 30 September, 1972 I arrived at Dubai. With
me on the same plane were other refugees, the families of Sheikh
Kassim Amour Barwani and of Sheikh Ahmed Issa Barwani. When we arrived
at the airport we found a large group of Zanzibaris anxiously waiting for
us. After finishing the immigration and custom formalities we got out and
fondly embraced with our brethren. Then everyone went with those who had
come specially to receive him. It was arranged that I should on that first
night stay with Sayyid Hashim Abdul-Muttalib Hashim, who at that
time was the President of the Zanzibar Association in Dubai. The next morning
I was taken by another of our brothers Sheikh Abdulla Ali, popularly known
as Abdulla Baba or Abdulla Nura. I stayed with him for a long time. All
my affairs were with him at his residence.
USURPERS' GOVERNMENT CONTINUES
DISCRIMINATION
The Usurpers' Government of Zanzibar is still continuing with its policy
of discrimination. Whoever was once a member of ZNP/ZPPP is looked upon
with disfavour and subjected to ill-treatment. It is now three decades
since the formal banning of all parties except the ruling one, and yet
those who were once themselves or their parents members of the ZNP and
ZPPP are hateful to the authorities. Although there is nothing that can
be proved against them they are still subjected to every type of discrimination.
What has been done to me as I am going to relate below is an indication
that the Usurpers' Government of Zanzibar still continues with its policy
of discrimination, discrimination in everything and every aspect.
I AM KICKED OUT OF MY COUNTRY
Twenty years after living abroad, I the writer of this little book, requested
permission to visit my native country, the country of my birth and the
birth of both my two parents. With difficulty I was given permission
to stay therein for three months. As a result I visited Zanzibar on 9th
January 1992 and on 18th February 1992 I returned to Dubai where I was
residing After six months, that is 9th August in the same year of 1992
I went again to Zanzibar. I intended this time to stay for three months
in order to start a farming project.
When I arrived at the airport I was told that if I wanted to
extend my visit I should apply to the Immigration Department. After
a month I went to the Immigration Department to apply for an extension.
On arrival they impounded my passport and was told to see the "boss". I
was escorted to the 'boss", one called Ali Daud. After some shilly-shally
he told me:
"Come the day after tomorrow, for the Boss is not here today. He
has gone to Dar-es-Salaam."
I asked this boss: "What is the matter?"
He replied: "The boss wants to see you."
I kept quiet and left. On the "day after tomorrow" I went again
to the Immigration Department. This time I was sent to another "boss",
Himid Yusuf Himid. This was a young man. His father and I were old acquaintances,
and, although we had opposing political views we respected each other and
got on well together. When I went to the office of the young man, Himid,
he told me: "Your problem has not yet been finalized. You may either wait
outside or you may go and come back about twelve noon."
When I returned at noon he asked me: "When does the plane to Arabia
leave?"
I told him: "It depends upon which plane you mean. There are two
planes which go to Arabia, and each one has its own day and time of departure."
He told me: "I mean the plane by which you travel."
I told him: "It leaves here for Dubai every Sunday morning at nine."
After I had told him that he told me: "Follow me!" I followed
him to another office where he handed over my passport to another young
man and instructed him: "Give him permission to stay in Zanzibar to Sunday
3-9-92, and write for him 'Final Extension'"
I asked that young man, Himid: "Why has all this come about? What
have I done in this country that I am denied extension to stay, and that
I am chased out of the country?"
The reply he gave as he was walking away was: "That is the decision
that has been arrived at." I kept quiet and waited for my passport. When
I got it I left to go and prepare for my departure. That day was
Friday and the date was 1-9-92. You will note that I was given less than
36 hours to depart from my country in which I was born, without being told
that I had committed any offense. The person who accompanied me was deeply
sorry for what happened, and he asked me: "Why should all this have happened?"
I told him: "Do not think that I have infringed any law during my
stay here. I have done nothing at all. However a lion is a lion even when
aged. All are afraid whenever he appears, particularly those who knew him
before. So, brother, do not seek for any other reason."
After my return to Dubai I began pondering over all that was done
to me, and I considered writing to the authorities in Zanzibar, particularly
as it was they themselves who had in the first place given me permission
to go and visit Zanzibar. In fact I could get no written answer from them,
but I heard that the authorities were saying that they knew of nothing
offensive that I had done during my stay in Zanzibar, but they would be
making further investigations. On my part I was trying hard to get permission
to re-enter Zanzibar without let or hindrance. I thank my in-laws and other
fellow countrymen for the great trouble they took, until finally with God's
help the way was open and I received permission to visit Zanzibar again.
I arrived in Zanzibar on 24 July 1994, and after staying for a month
and a few days I returned to my residence in Dubai on 27 August 1994. I
am grateful that this time I entered peacefully and left on my own peacefully,
and God willing it will always be peace.
MY FAMILY JOIN ME AT DUBAI
From the day I arrived at Dubai all my thoughts were concentrated on
looking for means to get my wife and children to join me so that we might
live together. The difficulty was not the question of transportation but
how to get out of Zanzibar. After my fleeing the country impediments were
placed to prevent my family leaving.
In due course Allah sent down His blessings. As the fly says: "If
you know one trick I know another." On 28 December 1976 my entire family,
my wife and children, arrived at Dubai through the assistance of UNHCR.
I am grateful to God that we are now living all together. Three
of my children have produced for us grandchildren that we can play with.
.I pray to God that He may help them to grow up in health and happiness
and through them He may prosper them and others not yet born.
Here I have come to the end of what I was anxious in my heart to
relate to my fellow-countrymen. In particular I was keen to get the young
ones who knew not the truth to know the facts regarding what happened in
their country, from the time of the beginning of political activities to
the time of what is called the revolution. They have been deceived and
told a great deal of lies and fabrications. This is therefore the truth.
These are the facts as far as I have been able to know them and have been
able to relate them. As I have already said it is my hope that others will
arise after reading this little book, who will be encouraged and feel it
is their duty to write more than what I have done about matters that I
did not know or simply forgot. Only God is perfect.
OTHER THINGS IN BRIEF
Mwalimu and Islam
For many many years Mwalimu Julius Kambarage Nyerere succeeded in deluding
the Muslims of Tanganyika and afterwards of Tanzania as a whole, that is
the mainland and the islands, by using the propaganda of "Arabs and
Slavery". Mwalimu's greatest enemy is not the "Arab" but Islam. Had he
been able to suddenly remove Islam from his eyes he would not have delayed
for one minute. But Mwalimu as he is an expert in political strategy
and tactics knows that to confront Islam openly and brazenly in a country
where he knows that the majority of its inhabitants are Muslims (they form
about 70% of the population) he would not succeed in his aim of keeping
Muslims under oppression. That is why he resorts to strategy in pursuing
his aim.
It was the Muslims of Tanganyika who had placed Nyerere in the leadership
because of their dedication to the welfare and development of their country.
It never occurred to them that by so doing they were providing their enemy
with a weapon with which he would try to eliminate them. As soon as Nyerere
acquired administrative authority he began pushing aside all Muslim leaders.
He began with kicking out of the party Sheikh Suleiman Takadir, then plotted
against Chief Said Abdulla Fundikira. Then pursued Sheikh Said
Tewa, Sheikh Zubeir Mtemvu, Sheikh Ali Mwinyi Tambwe, Bibi Tidi Muhammad
and many others. These suffice to mention, out of many who were nationalistic
supporters of TANU and the government, whom Mwalimu brought down and kicked
out because he believed that their blood was different from his. Their
belief was different from his own.
In proportion to the denial of rights to which Muslims were subjected,
in every aspect, in higher education, in government jobs, in industries
and everywhere else, those same rights and privileges were granted to non-Muslims.
Seeing the domination of non-Muslims in places of privilege and importance
gives a wrong impression to an outsider that Muslims in Tanzania are a
minority.
Whenever Mwalimu Nyerere talks of "Uwarabu" (Arabism) he really means
Islam. Unfortunately when he launches his bitter attacks against Arabs
and their alleged slavery his Muslim African followers in their delusion
clap for him and hail him as their spokesman. They are not aware that the
man is actually directing his attacks against their religion. When Tanganyika
got its independence on 9 December 1961 the Church prepared a special badge
on which was written: "Maria Mtakatifu, Ubariki Uhuru wa Tanganyika". (St.
Mary! Bless the Freedom of Tanganyika.) That badge was worn by Christians
as well as by many Muslims. of Tanganyika. Even some Muslims in Zanzibar
who were followers of the Afro-Shirazi Party wore them. As I have said
before in Tanganyika Muslims form the majority of the population, but during
the celebration of independence on 9 December, 1961 the first to go up
the platform to pray for blessings was a Christian bishop, who was then
followed by a Muslim sheikh. It must have been the impression of anyone
witnessing that ceremony that Tanganyika was a predominantly Christian
country. The fact is contrary to that, but the majority are kept under
suppression, politically, educationally, economically and socially. Nyerere
has succeeded during his rule, and even after his official retirement (which
is indeed a mere change of roles, for he is still the power behind the
scene) it is clear that Christianity as a religion has the upper hand in
all things because, allegedly, it is the faith of the majority. The real
truth is that the State empowers Christianity and places it in the front,
giving it dignity and importance and proportionately denies equal
opportunities to the majority because of their Islamic faith!
In his tactics to undermine Islam Nyerere has devised a slogan which
has also deluded the Muslims themselves who keep on singing it without
understanding its real implication. The slogan says "SERIKALI YA TANZANIA
HAINA DINI", literally meaning "The Government of Tanzania has no religion."
The apparent implication is that the Government is secular. The real
intention is to create a stick with which to control the Muslims of the
country. It is to prevent Muslims from making any movement to improve themselves
in various fields, such as co-operating with brother Muslims in other parts
of the world, and associating with international Islamic organizations,
indeed even those of East Africa. With that stick Muslims are prevented
from seeking and executing projects of development for themselves
and even for the general public, such as the establishment of educational
institutions, medicare and development in general. A very good example
of Mwalimu's opposition to Islam for every Muslim to take into consideration
is what happened towards the end of 1993 when the Zanzibar Government applied
to join the Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC). Nyerere in his hatred
for Islam could not hide his claws. He told Salmin Amour, the President
of Zanzibar, to choose between his being President and his joining the
OIC. Another example of the same type was Nyerere's crusade against
the flourishing East African Welfare Society, as well as the AMNUT (All
Muslim National Union of Tanganyika. All these have been done during the
reign of Nyerere. The great project of establishing a University for the
Muslims of East and Central Africa in Zanzibar with the help of Egypt early
in 1964 was largely responsible for the precipitation of the January 1964
invasion of the country. The saddest thing is that in all his work of undermining
Islam Mwalimu utilizes the services of those who, however unworthily, bear
Muslim names, to do his dirty work. Rarely does he personally muddy his
own hands either in politics or religion. (As far as he is concerned there
is no difference between religion and politics or politics and religion.
It is others who should stick to that dictum of separating religion from
politics!)
The whole of East Africa was once upon a time under Muslim rule.
Portugal did once rule over Zanzibar, and after her came Britain avowedly
to "protect" it, but in reality to rule it. Germany ruled Tanganyika and
then came Britain. The European nations were Christian but they never interfered
with the religion of the people trying to change religious customs or traditions
in the countries they ruled. Muslims had the freedom to marry and inherit
one another according to their religion and customs, and so did the Christians,
Buddhists, Hindus and Zoroastrians.. Indeed even pagans had the freedom
to follow their own tribal traditions in matters of personal laws under
Muslim rule. But when Mwalimu came into the scene he vowed that it should
either be he or Islam. The two could not co-exist. Islam should give in.
But Allah Most high will never bow to him.
An important piece of strategy in undermining Islam in Tanzania was
the law of confiscating people's properties under the pretense of what
they call "nationalization". By this simple act the whole Islamic community
has been fleeced, and not only the people but the mosques, madressas and
orphanages. The farms of Said and Abdulla have been handed over to Peter
and Paul and Edington. The bequests of the mosques have been confiscated,
but those of the churches are intact because they are in Europe and America
in banks earning usuries, and in big international corporations earning
huge profits. The poor deluded African Muslims sing in jubilation with
their Christian countrymen "Mali ya Umma! Mali ya Umma!" : "People's Properties!"
when Mwalimu robbed the people of their properties. These are not the people's
properties, they belong to Julius, John and James. And now without any
subterfuge those Muslim properties, particularly in Zanzibar, are being
handed over to Mafia gangs. Those are our new masters. Those will help
build churches with corrupted laundered money. Where will Pandu and Jecha
be? When Arabs, Asians and Comorians were being hounded out and humiliated
others felt unconcerned if not inwardly jubilant. Now it is the Wahadimu,
Watumbatu and Wapemba who are being hounded out of their islands, their
hamlets, their beaches of the East coast, their Nungwi steppes and have
their homes demolished. Now it is the indigenous peasants of Zanzibar who
are receiving the brunt of foreign occupation. Under the guise of "secularism"
and African chauvinism the Zanzibari has really been turned into the underdog
to serve the interests of foreigners, be they white or black. The Zanzibari
of Arab, Shirazi or Comorian stock has become the odd man out, like the
Red Indian in America and the aborigine in Australia. Pandu and Jecha have
no longer the right to draw water or pass through the land of their ancestors
now occupied by the new white masters who have acquired proprietary rights
over their land, given by usurping authorities, which came to power through
massacres, lootings and deportation. That is the Mwalimu of Progress, Socialism
and Self-reliance. That is the Mwalimu who is fulfilling his vow
of "Either I or Islam!" When the people see their leader trying to stop
the march of time and tide, it is their duty to examine the head of such
a leader and to make a choice between the profit and loss of continuing
to have him with them.
Mwalimu and Slavery
This is the second question which Mwalimu uses in his strategy when he
confronts Islam, especially when he discusses Zanzibar and "Arabism". Whenever
Mwalimu talks about slavery he never fails to associate it with Arabism,
the Sultanate and Zanzibar, as if indeed that institution had never been
practiced anywhere in the world except in Zanzibar, and nobody had ever
engaged in it except the Arabs. Everybody knows that slavery was in the
old days a common practice all over the world. Arabs, Europeans, Africans,
Indians and all races of all faiths engaged in the trade of purchasing
and selling their fellow human beings. If you were to make comparisons
you would see that it was the Christians who were foremost in this trade.
From Africa came slaves, and it was to America the colonies of the Europeans
that they were sent to cultivate their plantations and to do other hard
jobs in their various projects.
How did the black men reach America if they had not been taken by
Europeans who were Christians? Or were the slave traders who sent two hundred
and fifty million black Africans to America Muslims? Mwalimu has
for too long been hoodwinking the Muslim community of Tanzania, but thank
God, the Muslim community of today has come to understand Mwalimu very
well, just as much as they understand that when he refers to "Arabism"
he really means 'Islam". The Muslims have now opened their eyes. They will
no longer be cheated to the extent of killing each other as they did in
the year 1964 in Zanzibar. By treachery the people of Zanzibar were instigated
to get rid of Monarchy and Arabism, and thousands who were not even Arabs
or monarchists were then murdered because of their conscience.
Many others were murdered after the invasion (among whom were those whom
I have earlier mentioned) who were not Arabs, such as Othman Sharif, Mdungi
Usi, Jaha Ubwa, Saleh Saadallah, Abdulla Kassim Hanga and others. There
are a considerable number of so-called Arabs who committed atrocities together
with the rest of them who were part and parcel of the usurping authority.
They were protected and privileged because they agreed to subjugate their
faith and uphold the faithless doctrines of the usurping regime. In the
eyes of Nyerere, Ali Muhsin was an Arab, but Babu was not; Muhammad
Shamte was an Arab but Salmin Amour was not. Strange criteria!
There are fundamental questions regarding slavery in Zanzibar which
are well known to Mwalimu, he not being illiterate like Karume, but which
he for reasons of his own does not like to mention. In 1822 Sayyid Said
bin Sultan, who was then Sultan of Oman and East Africa, banned slave trading
between his dominions and all European countries. In 1845 he prohibited
the export of slaves from East Africa to Oman. In the year 1872 Sayyid
Barghash, son of Said, who was Sultan of Zanzibar abolished the slave trade
completely. It was only in 1890, eighteen years later, that the Western
nations, which were all Christian, that they abolished the slave trade
by what is called the Brussels Act of 1890.
In the year 1897 the Sultan of Zanzibar, Sayyid Hamoud bin
Muhammad, grandson of Said, abolished slavery itself in Zanzibar.
Thus as from that date there could be no slave at all in Zanzibar and anyone
arriving a slave would automatically be a free man. However in British
ruled Kenya slavery was not abolished until 1912, and in Tanganyika under
the Germans slavery continued until they were driven out, and the victorious
British continued with it until 1920. It was at that time that they abolished
slavery. One can see therefore that slavery flourished in Tanganyika for
23 years after it had been abolished in Zanzibar. We may well ask Mwalimu
Nyerere which country deserves to be entitled "The navel of slavery"?
The slavery under which we groan and which is much more oppressive
than that of the past is the slavery that has been imposed on us by Nyerere
and Karume. It is the slavery of subjecting the people of Zanzibar and
of Tanganyika to the law of arbitrary arrest and imprisonment without committing
any offense and without trial for indefinite periods, under the so-called
law of Preventive Detention, a law which indeed nullifies all laws and
all Human Rights.
As a further punishment those slaves of Nyerere/Karume were subjected
to humiliating tortures from which many died. Those committed (without
resort to courts of law) were condemned to hard labour from seven in the
morning to six in the evening. Others were put in torture chambers
without food and were subjected to humiliating and debilitating torments
that are impossible to describe. That is the slavery that we have witnessed
and experienced under Karume and Jumbe, and whose notorious law of so-called
"Preventive Detention" still exists in the law books of Zanzibar and Tanzania.
So also does the "Forced Marriage Act". Mwalimu Nyerere was the President
of the Tanzanian Union and is still the chief manipulator of everything
that goes on in the country. He is therefore squarely responsible for the
slavery that we all have been labouring under. Why is it that we never
hear Mwalimu saying anything against this slavery that is practiced under
his very nose? Neither do we hear any of his stooge mouthpieces say
anything about this slavery?
LOCAL GOSSIP
After the victory of what was called the "Revolution" a great deal of falsehood
was propagated against the ZNP/ZPPP government which had been overthrown.
The aim was to destroy the love and confidence that a considerable portion
of the people had with that government which had been democratically elected.
The authors of this anti ZNP/ZPPP propaganda so cleverly plotted their
strategy that some people, because of their weak faith, came nearly to
believe the falsehood that was being spread about. The ground was well
prepared for the spread of any falsehood. The people as a whole had been
terrorized and traumatized. Many, particularly those who knew and could
speak and write, had been killed, exiled or were kept in cold storage in
prison. Fantastic allegations and fabrications had therefore their heyday..
One such allegation which gained credence in those days was that
the leaders of the ousted ZNP/ZPPP government had turned down the offer
of aid from the British Government. Others alleged that the Egyptian government
had offered to dispatch military assistance for the defence of Zanzibar,
but that the ZNP/ZPPP government turned down that offer, and instead requested
a musical and dancing group from Egypt. Others still alleged that Ali Muhsin
had a secret arrangement with Karume to bring about the revolution in order
to get rid of the Sultan. I say that all such allegations, which were bandied
about and are still being spread, are false and lies. They have not the
slightest basis of truth. The British Government (for reasons which became
clear afterwards) did not want to offer any defence assistance to the Government
of Zanzibar, although it did give military assistance to Kenya, Uganda
and Tanganyika.
Britain ruled Zanzibar (by the subterfuge of protection) in peace
and understanding for 73 years (1890-1963). That same Britain a month
after relinquishing its rule by mutual consent and without a single British
national being touched, totally refused to come to the aid of Zanzibar
in its hour of need while people were ruthlessly being massacred! The damning
thing in the eyes of Britain was that the government which was then in
power and which requested that aid was the ZNP/ZPPP government.
The Prime Minister Muhammad Shamte, the Minister of Foreign Affairs,
Ali Muhsin and the Minister of Finance, Juma Aley, requested Mr. Crostwaith,
the British High Commissioner in Zanzibar on 12 January 1964 to convey
to Britain Zanzibar's request for military assistance to stop the
carnage of innocent citizens by mobs of thugs specially brought for the
purpose. The High Commissioner turned down that request made by a fellow
Commonwealth government which had been democratically elected by
the people. He refused alleging that he could not convey that request
because it was a week-end. He could not therefore get in touch with the
Home government! Was it conceivable that the entire British Government
went out fishing or swimming on week-ends? Under any circumstances,
he said, he would not recommend to Her Majesty's Government to interfere
in Zanzibar's internal affairs. A week later, on 20 January 1964
after the overthrow of Zanzibar, there was an attempt by the army of Tanganyika
(not mobs of hooligans, mind you!) to overthrow Nyerere's government. Within
no time that same British Government came to the rescue of their blue-eyed
boy. The British navy bombarded the Karito military barracks, landed marines,
disarmed the mutineers, rescued Nyerere from his hiding and put him back
on the throne. What was the difference between the two, the overthrow of
Zanzibar with its attendant massacres failing to get even humanitarian
assistance from the head of the Commonwealth, and the attempted overthrow
of Tanganyika which was immediately quashed by the military might of Britain.
The difference was that Jamshid, Shamte and Muhsin did not fit in the imperial
scheme of things, but Nyerere did. What happened to the thousands of innocent
Zanzibaris who were killed was just too bad. But did it really matter when
imperial, nay Western, interests were at stake?
It is not true at all that the ZNP/ZPPP government turned down an
offer of military assistance from Egypt. It is true that the question of
security and defence of Zanzibar had been thoroughly discussed by the two
governments. As a result of those discussions certain necessary procedural
steps had to be taken. These were necessarily of a highly sensitive and
secretive nature. A leakage took place and the "powers that be" arranged
to forestall the entrenchment of Zanzibar as an independent sovereign state.
The machinery that down the centuries had engineered the reduction of
the once expansive Zanzibar empire to the two tiny islands, would dearly
wish to see its being totally wiped out of the map. Hence the precipitate
invasion of 12 January 1964 as a prelude to its final annexation.
Regarding the story of a musical and dancing group from Egypt, in
that the ZNP/ZPPP rejected the offer of security arrangements in favour
of singers and dancers, such an allegation is childish even in conception.
The two have not the least relevance. The Firqat Ridha troupe came on their
own to take part in the celebration of independence as a gesture of goodwill
and brotherhood between the people of Egypt and those of Zanzibar. The
first inkling that the Zanzibar government knew of their coming was when
they were already in Nairobi and they telephoned Sh. Ali Muhsin of their
coming. Hastily the minister got into contact with the go-getter Sh Ali
Said Kharusi, to make hasty arrangements for their reception, as there
was hardly any accommodation for these unexpected guests when our limited
facilities had already been so sorely stretched. Sh Kharusi however
managed hurriedly to make arrangements for them to stay in the Girl School
Hostel at Forodhani, the school being closed for vacation.
The allegation that Ali Muhsin had a secret agreement with
Karume to oust the Sultan is not only a lie but also stupidity itself.
For anyone to utter such nonsense is either due to a complete lack of brains,
or utter ignorance of the Zanzibar constitution one of whose principal
architects was Ali Muhsin himself. The position of the Sultan was constitutionally
entranced and therefore inviolable. Even so if both the government and
the opposition wanted to terminate monarchy there was no constitutional
impediment to do so peacefully and constitutionally. There was no need
for the massacres, imprisonments and floggings that accompanied the
so-called revolution.
As for those who allege that Ali Muhsin was offered a ministerial
post by the usurper government of Karume their permanent residence should
be the mental hospital. I think here there is a question of mistaken
identity. The man who associated with Karume in ousting the Sultan and
was then rewarded with a ministerial post was Babu, and not Ali Muhsin.
Ali Muhsin could never be a traitor to his country, to his people or to
his Sultan..
Another unfounded allegation is the oft-repeated one that Ali Muhsin
was warned of the Afro-Shirazi and Comrades plotting to overthrow the government
but Ali Muhsin pooh-poohed the whole idea saying: "A government is not
a cup of tea to be overturned." Others allege it was Juma Aley (Minister
of Finance) who made that statement, and others it was Dr. Baalawy (Minister
of Health). In short such allegations have several ramifications, each
one making his assertion according to his own particular taste.
The true situation was that Sh Ali Muhsin was the leader of the Zanzibar
Nationalist Party. He was so not by being elected, but just being accepted
by the party in appreciation of his services and commitment to the
national struggle. But even so he was not the leader of the government.
He was Minister of External Affairs. The leader of the government was Sh
Muhammad Shamte as Prime Minister. Defence and security were under the
Prime Minister and the Minister of Home Affairs, Sh Salim Kombo. The Assistant
Minister for Home Affairs was Sh Rashid Hamadi. Therefore Sh Ali Muhsin
was not responsible for security at the time of the revolution.
As soon as the Prime Minister, Sh Muhammad Shamte, received information
that the Afro-Shirazis and the Comrades were preparing to cause disturbances
as they had done in June, 1961 he immediately took the necessary administrative
steps. He summoned the heads of Police and Security and discussed with
them the situation. Those heads assured the Prime Minister that they would
be able to contain the situation so long as it was internal. In compliance
with democratic procedure the Prime Minister had fully discharged his obligation.
It was for the executive officers, the departmental heads, to carry out
the instructions.
If anyone was guilty of negligence to the extent that disaster followed
the guilty party was not the Prime Minister or any of the Ministers. The
guilty parties were the executive officers responsible for security. The
Ministers were responsible for policy, initiating legislation and
direction, but not execution on the ground. If the question is whether
the Ministers did or did not follow procedure that is a totally different
question. They did.
Facts must be stated, not for the sake of laying blame on somebody,
or looking for scapegoats for one's own default. This is not the time for
mutual recrimination. This is the time to join hands together and put heads
together in seeking ways of wisdom, peace and constructiveness in reviving
our bleeding and dying country which has been badly mauled. . We
should not just sit down lamenting and crying over spilt milk, while time
is flying past, every day, every hour, indeed every minute. Our immediate
duty is to bury our differences and become One, an indivisible entity.
Let us unite all our forces to save our country for posterity. The responsibility
is fully and squarely on our shoulders. We are all, individually and collectively,
answerable to God Almighty, and we are answerable to generations yet unborn..
The most noticeable thing in the false allegations that are leveled
against the ZNP/ZPPP is their crystal clear contradiction. On the
one hand Ali Muhsin and the ZNP/ZPPP government are accused of being royalists,
loyalists and pro-Sultan. At the same time they are accused of conniving
with Karume, of all the people, to overthrow the Sultan. And, so the spinners
of lies propound, Karume turned against Ali Muhsin. Instead he put
him in prison where he remained languishing for ten years and five months.
Now which of these contradictory stories shall we believe in?
There has now sprung up a completely new story created by a
journalist, David Martin. He has alleged in a seminar organized by the
usurper government of Zanzibar at Bwawani Hotel that the British colluded
with ZNP/ZPPP and handed over the government to them
although the ZNP/ZPPP had lost the elections! Lost the elections? ZNP/ZPPP
won 18 seats to the 13 of the ASP. According to the Constitution agreed
to by all the parties including the ASP the group that commanded the majority
seats, not votes, was the one that formed the government. And that is the
democracy in practice in Westminster, the Mother of Parliaments. It did
not require the British or any body else to hand over government to the
winners. The winners were the ones that won a majority of seats in parliament.
There is surely no shortage of figments of imagination among some people.
They can create fantasies out of thin air. But this man Martin is not only
ignorant of the past, ignorant of politics and ignorant of history. He
does not know the present. He says that the present contradictions between
the CCM and CUF parties in Zanzibar are a result of a centuries old
divide. His reference is to the favourable imperialist ploy of raising
the eternal myth of Arab-African conflict. Where do Arabs come in?
And who indeed is an Arab and who is an African in the Zanzibar context?
David Martin does not even care to know that the leaders of both the contending
parties are of the same ethnic group. They are both Shirazis. Neither is
an Arab or both are Arabs, if you like. That goes also for much of
the rank and file of the two parties. Under any circumstances why should
a man be damnable merely because of his ethnic origin? For thousands of
years, not hundreds, Arabs have been nationals of Zanzibar and the whole
coast of East Africa. They have as much claim to indignity as any body
else. And even so, indignity is not the arbiter in deciding one's nationality,
and one's right to participate in the government of any country.. It is
one's birth, nativity that is the criterion for nationality and belonging.
How many generations does it take for a person to be identified with any
country or region? Or is the criterion colour? By any standards Arabs,
Shirazis, Africans, Comorians and Asians born in Zanzibar are nationals
of Zanzibar and nothing and nobody can deny them their national rights,
least of all David Martin.
MULTI-PARTY DEMOCRACY
It is not the aim of Multi-party democracy to enforce the creation of parties
so that they may engage in inter-party conflict. Neither is it the
aim of democracy to have a minority to rule over the majority, or
the majority to rule over the minority. The aim is to get rid of the system
whereby it is expressly prohibited to establish all political parties after
the establishment of the one and only one which arrogates to itself the
sole right of existence and ruling. Among Human Rights is the right for
citizens to found or associate or not to associate with any party. It is
against Human Rights to deny people their national right not to associate
with the ruling party.
Indeed if one person is denied equal rights with any other in the
country because he or she is not a member of the ruling party, or because
he or she belongs to a party other than the ruling party, or because of
his colour, race or country of origin or religion - if any of these things
happen, then the fundamental principles of democracy have not been fulfilled.
The contrary is what is true democracy.
A one-party democracy as it was (and still is in Tanganyika and Zanzibar,
because all parties except one are of no account) is not democracy at all.
That is not the rule of the people by the people for the people. It is
the rule of the few over the rest. It is an "Oligarchy". The leaders
of CCM claim that their party has two million members, out of a population
of 26 million! Granted that to be true those two million have no voice
within their party. Their function is to say "Yes, Mwalimu!" to every decision
taken by the oracle. In fact that is dictatorship, the dictatorship of
one man, it is an "Autocracy". Neither is democracy the rule of the majority
suppressing the minorities. True Democracy is the participation of
the people as a whole in the rule of their country through their freely
elected representatives, with every citizen having equally recognized rights
in the affairs of state for the general good. Indeed even non-citizens
have their recognized rights as residents in a truly democratic society.
HOW TO ACHIEVE DEMOCRACY
The best way to achieve an acceptable democratic rule is through what is
called Proportional Representation. It is the election of candidates not
by a simple majority geographical constituency, but the voting strength
of the party. By the simple majority voting there is a likelihood of two
parties only coming into effective existence, the one that wins even by
one seat, and rules unimpeded, and the one that loses even by one seat
becomes the opposition and is denied participation in the government. Its
function is limited to opposition, and struggling by every means to come
to power even through the overthrowing of the ruling party by force. This
is a vicious circle which never ends. The country becomes permanently on
tenterhooks, permanently in conflict with itself. In underdeveloped countries
such a system is a breeding ground for violent revolutions and counter-revolutions.
With proportional representation however various parties have a much
better chance of representation in the legislature, and a much greater
opportunity to participate in the government. Thus with a greater spread
of responsibility and accountability there will be a general feeling of
political fulfillment among the populace and a reduction of the feverish
rise of political temperature which generates violence.
The Parliamentary Proportional Representation system is used in a
number of countries such as Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Holland,
Austria, Switzerland, and Germany. The proposed Scottish parliament hopes
to adopt proportional representation, which the Scotch consider more fair
and just. In all those countries the Head of State has no administrative
or executive functions. He is the head of state, not of government. His
functions are honorary and symbolic. He is above the hurly-burly of politics
and political parties. He symbolizes the unity and sovereignty of the state.
The powers of government lie in the parliament through the cabinet which
is answerable to the parliament and the parliament is answerable to the
electorate, the people. Such a system is commendable for those countries
just emerging from a totalitarian or colonial regime, or in countries with
a multi-tribal racial or sectarian structure, or those countries with parties
not yet developed enough to accept with grace losing an election. More
important still is that the proposed system will help in minimizing the
greed for power, since that power is not concentrated but diffused,
among the whole community who in one way or another share participation,
responsibility and accountability.
We, the people of Zanzibar, have been badly bitten by a snake. We
must be wary when we see anything that wriggles ominously. Let us avoid
the inculcation of hatred as we avoid the snake. Let us be wary of the
past horrors. The West until this day are deeply suspicious of the revival
of Nazism and Communism, their chiefest enemies of the past. We also must
not forget that we would not have suffered so badly had it not been for
the narrow-minded racialism preached by ASP and the infantile slogan-toting
of the Comrades. As a result of our experience and the affliction under
which we have been groaning for the last three or four decades let us beware
and prevent the recurrence of those calamities; "The faithful is not bitten
from the same pit twice.".
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I take this opportunity through this little book to express my gratitude
to those who stood with me and my partners and extended to us unlimited
assistance in arranging our departure from Zanzibar until we arrived at
Mombasa, and from Mombasa until we reached Dubai.
For obvious reasons I cannot reveal the identities of those who gave
us that assistance, in particular those who ferried us by canoe from
Zanzibar to the coast of Tanganyika. Further than that they gave us their
own kith and kin to accompany us in that hazardous journey in order to
ensure our safety. I will not also divulge the name of our brother at Tanga
who welcomed us, kept us in his house, and looked to all our human needs.
Similarly I reserve the name of that youth of ours who at the risk of his
life led us through the bush until we reached the safety of Mombasa.
As for those whom I am free to mention by name on behalf of myself
and my partners I will start with conveying thanks to Sh Muhammad Soud
bin Ali bin Bashir together with the whole family of Sh Soud bin Ali bin
Bashir of Mombasa. That is the family which received us at Mombasa and
looked after all our needs. For all the time we stayed with that family
there was not a single instance of any difference between us and them.
I cannot in writing or speech express the deep sense of gratitude for this
family, a gratitude that can come anywhere near what they did for us.
I am fully conscious that they themselves would not like to have their
names mentioned like this or to be thanked for what they did. I hereby
beg their pardon as it is not easy for me to refrain from mentioning them.
May God Most Merciful shower His unstinted blessings on this good family
both in this world and the next.
Similarly it is my duty and pride to extend my thanks to our respected
elder Sh Nasser bin Salim Al Riyami. This elderly gentleman discarded everything
of his and engaged himself fully in the task of helping in every way possible
his fellow-countrymen and women who arrived at Mombasa as refugees from
the terrors of Zanzibar. I dare-say that without this gentleman’s devoted
assistance our onward journey to Arabia would not have been possible. Another
person who deserves the gratitude not only of myself but all of us, refugees,
is Sh Salim Muhasham. This gentleman was the official representative of
the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. However, he did much
more than what his official duties demanded. It was with deep human devotion
that he extended all the assistance he could to his brothers and sisters,
the refugees fleeing Zanzibar. Another personality who quietly and unobtrusively
received, welcomed and helped refugees to move forward or to get settled
in Kenya was Abu Suleiman Al Mazrui. To a considerable extent he symbolized
Mombasa hospitality.
I would be failing in my duty if I did not mention the name of Bibi
Sharifa Ahmed Al-Busaidy. This noble lady devoted all her time, day and
night, in order to render help and assistance to those of her countrymen
and countrywomen who in desperation reached Mombasa after escaping the
hellish conditions of Zanzibar. She looked after everybody without any
discrimination. She rendered moral as well as material assistance and personal
service. Equal with Bibi Sharifa were Bibi Freya Mbarak Ali Hinawy and
Binyomo (Bibi Raya Majid Maamiry). The services that these noble ladies
rendered to the desperate refugees from Zanzibar arriving homeless and
traumatized was worthy of Mother Tereza herself. May Allah shower them
all with His blessings.
Last but not least I would like to thank the Committee of the Zanzibar
Association in Dubai which was in office at the time, namely Sayyid Hashim
Abdul-Muttalib Hashim and his entire Committee. Their warm welcome and
help in every way possible made all the refugees feel at home Indeed
the humanitarian work and help rendered by ordinary men and women on the
coast of Tanganyika and the coast of Kenya for their tormented brethren
fleeing from Zanzibar during those days of trial and tribulation deserve
books and books. It is a field that calls for research and recording.
To cap it all my thanks are due to my brother Sh Abdulla Ali (popularly
known as Abdulla Baba) and his entire family. For it was with them that
I put up since my arrival until the time when I could move into a place
of my own. My Allah bless this family.
To conclude I must here declare on behalf of all Zanzibaris who have
sought and found refuge in the hospitable lands of the Arabian Gulf that
there is nothing we can do and say to express the sense of gratitude to
the Rulers and our brethren the people of the Gulf. for their kindness
in receiving us as their own kith and kin. This region has become our home,
no less dear than the one we had to leave in the hour of need. May Allah
prosper the Rulers and People of the Gulf.