Notes on a Paradigm


NOTES ON A PARADIGM: Information and Change (A Cryptic Triptych) Kernel Kurtz - 10/28/90 - I - Now as we enter the closing decade of the twentieth century, we might well take stock of where we, as a species, stand in relation to the larger realities of the cosmos: are we in fact any closer to understanding than we have ever been? My own intuitive feeling is that, of the several factors which may now be seen to be converging, certain important elements are of overwhelming significance. The paradigm shift in science, for example, will ultimately change the collective reality of our species (as has happened before) in ways which current hierarchies of power and wealth are equipped neither to understand nor to control. Indeed, the changes we now face, while clearly the most comprehensive yet, are no more predictable than they are determinate in terms of current conventional wisdom. Our culture is in extremis today, between, as it were, a rock and a hard place. The conduct of business and government, entwined in their incestuous relationship, is hidden from the people by layer upon layer of deliberate deceit. In a political system in which liberals are portrayed as leftist by government and the media, moderates are called liberals, and hardline right-wing conservatives disguise themselves as the soul of sweet reason, how can an enlightened electorate exist, let alone prevail? The results of "modern" culture's adversarial relationship with Nature and Humanity, which are in effect holding a gun to the head of our entire species (not to mention the planet), have emerged as the catastrophic issues of our time. Overpopulation, pollution, war, and the depletion of global resources (soil, oceans, minerals, rain forests, etc.) are the problems which must be solved before it is too late. Such problems are exacerbated, and their solutions made more elusive, by the existence of self-serving political and economic institutions, whose members, operating within belief systems which define Nature as enemy rather than ally, deny (and indeed militate against) the need and the effort to save the planet. - II - There are of course positive trends at work as well: the Greens, the Rainbows, and other such grassroots movements. These activists are engaged in bypassing conventional cultural channels in the achievement of their ends. The agenda is not one of political opportunism, but rather of flexibility, for the sake of survival itself: it is the comprehension of opposing agendas, and the adaptation to increased freedom of action, which makes this a viable and necessary response. Which brings us to the question of what we now know. Modern science, in the early years of this century, came to a startling conclusion, which has caused great consternation (and hysterical efforts to adapt) ever since: Human Awareness changes Reality. (Note that such an assertion has been made of late by various authors, including Fritjof Capra, Fred Wolf, Bohm, Herbert, et al. Also see Metaphysics Anonymous volumes 1, 2 and 3.) The changes which have occurred as a result (despite the overt political vicissitudes of the times) have created profound differences in the worldview of our species as a whole, beginning with the radical disorientation in global perceptions experienced by intellectuals. Since Galileo, proponents of science have found themselves in conflict with established dogma. It is only in "modern" times that the empirical viewpoint has gained currency in the established consensus worldview. Ironically, this new intellectual freedom has resulted in the confirmation of exactly the sort of sloppy, mystical insight which science holds most suspect: full circle, as it were. Synchronicity, it would seem, is an indispensable element of reality; not merely on the quantum level of modern physics, but in the greater affairs of our species within the cosmos as well. This brings us to an ineluctable conclusion: that there is an inescapable responsibility implicit in our awareness which we must somehow learn how to manifest in our future conduct, both individually and collectively, if we are to survive. Humans, it seems, are each constrained by our own internal limitations. We may be less the victims of our universe than of ourselves. However, in the effort to understand, we may transcend ourselves; indeed, this might be the salvation of our species. If in our attempts to know the realities we must deal with we can learn responsibility, then there may yet be hope for us. It seems to me that an operational definition of reality must take into account the individual viewpoints within which we each must operate; that the consensus (which will generate the paradigm shift) must be an overview of the collective experience of reality. This recalls Eldon's notion that "The Universe is an audience-participation event". - III - As humans, we inhabit a milieu unique among the myriad species living within Earth's biosphere: more than any other life form, we are the creatures of our own time-binding abilities. This means that not only our physical and mental being, but the psychic and material manifestations which we unconsciously assume to be "reality", are in fact the constructs of collective human experience; no more, no less. We are now at the end of the formative period during which we could afford to take these matters for granted. This is most readily apparent at present in the dichotomy between women and men in our society: our culture has become embroiled in an adversarial relationship, separated by gender, which we must reconcile in order to evolve as a species. We are faced with the unavoidable necessity of assuming responsibility for what humanity has wrought. This assumption of our responsibility requires that we, as a whole species, now come to terms with our own psyche as it is collectively manifest, for better and for worse. The time has come to own our weakness and our strength, our evil as our good, in the knowledge and the love we share as human beings. When we awaken. I feel we now have an unparalleled opportunity to become agents of change: both as aware individuals and as participants in the major trends of these "interesting times". We have the means of affecting such change at our disposal; as individuals and together as a species, we have never before had such powers of global communication, transportation, and organization. When the Live-Aid musicians gathered to sing "We are the World" their words may have been meant metaphorically; in "reality" however, this statement was the simple truth. As humans, in the power of our collective awareness, we are, indeed, the world which we experience, and so create: and it is up to us to make this world anew, whole and healed. We cannot go on denying what we have done. Inasmuch as humans have made of our world a nightmare, so it is that many of humankind are yet asleep; it is in our waking that we become empowered, to heal and cherish the world we all must share. It is in the unprecedented energy which we can collectively manifest that we may find the power we seek: together our awareness can bring us to a new and better world. It's not too soon to start.


Vino and Veritas